Re: Rank The Star Wars Movies
Posted: Thu May 31, 2018 2:10 pm
They employ like 5 people for just that very purpose.
They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
The way I see it, there's including easter eggs for fans, and then there's letting the plot of a cartoon with a substantially smaller viewer base than the live-action films stand in the way of their new ideas for where to take the story. I really believe that the moment it comes to that point, they'll just change what's canon again. And I have a feeling this will be tested in the next couple of movies. Quote this post when it happensB wrote:They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
No ... I am talking out of my ass but I'm SURE I'M RIGHTdimejinky99 wrote:Has he never heard of the story group and that the directors and writers collaborate with them?
I wouldn't call Maul an Easter egg. And casual fans probably all thought, "wait that guy died". But he was alive and well in both animated series. I think that is some pretty serious collaboration within the Canontheplatypus wrote:The way I see it, there's including easter eggs for fans, and then there's letting the plot of a cartoon with a substantially smaller viewer base than the live-action films stand in the way of their new ideas for where to take the story. I really believe that the moment it comes to that point, they'll just change what's canon again. And I have a feeling this will be tested in the next couple of movies. Quote this post when it happensB wrote:They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
I've seen so many people thinking that Solo takes place before Phantom Menace. I'm like... how fucking old do you think Han is?!E.H. Ruddock wrote:I wouldn't call Maul an Easter egg. And casual fans probably all thought, "wait that guy died". But he was alive and well in both animated series. I think that is some pretty serious collaboration within the Canontheplatypus wrote:The way I see it, there's including easter eggs for fans, and then there's letting the plot of a cartoon with a substantially smaller viewer base than the live-action films stand in the way of their new ideas for where to take the story. I really believe that the moment it comes to that point, they'll just change what's canon again. And I have a feeling this will be tested in the next couple of movies. Quote this post when it happensB wrote:They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
Right, but they brought him back in the animated series. They chose to continue a storyline that was a huge part of both of the animated series in the Solo movietheplatypus wrote:Maul is a character from a live-action movie, though. I mean, I don't watch the cartoons, and his appearance didn't break my brain like "BUT WAIT I THOUGHT HE WAS DEAD?!?!?". I just thought "huh, they're bringing him back, cool".
Have casual fans seen The Phantom Menace?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I wouldn't call Maul an Easter egg. And casual fans probably all thought, "wait that guy died". But he was alive and well in both animated series. I think that is some pretty serious collaboration within the Canontheplatypus wrote:The way I see it, there's including easter eggs for fans, and then there's letting the plot of a cartoon with a substantially smaller viewer base than the live-action films stand in the way of their new ideas for where to take the story. I really believe that the moment it comes to that point, they'll just change what's canon again. And I have a feeling this will be tested in the next couple of movies. Quote this post when it happensB wrote:They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
ALB wrote:Have casual fans seen The Phantom Menace?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I wouldn't call Maul an Easter egg. And casual fans probably all thought, "wait that guy died". But he was alive and well in both animated series. I think that is some pretty serious collaboration within the Canontheplatypus wrote:The way I see it, there's including easter eggs for fans, and then there's letting the plot of a cartoon with a substantially smaller viewer base than the live-action films stand in the way of their new ideas for where to take the story. I really believe that the moment it comes to that point, they'll just change what's canon again. And I have a feeling this will be tested in the next couple of movies. Quote this post when it happensB wrote:They have to be though, right? I mean with the Rebels references in Rogue One and Solo. I don't know if they sit around a table and discuss it, but I'm certain that Lucasfilm has people that check and veto things that violate canon ... or at least require an explanation be given.theplatypus wrote:Like, I really can't imagine a bunch of writers and producers at a meeting going "no we can't do that WE HAVE TO RESPECT THE CARTOON'S CONTINUITY"
stop itLoathedVermin72 wrote:Return of the Jedi
The Empire Strikes Back
Rogue One
A New Hope
The Battle for Endor
Caravan of Courage
The Phantom Menace
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
The Last Jedi
Solo
The Force Awakens
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Return of the Jedi
The Empire Strikes Back
Rogue One
A New Hope
The Battle for Endor
Caravan of Courage
The Phantom Menace
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
The Last Jedi
Solo
The Force Awakens
Though, that being said.....which Ewok movie involves that massive spider in the cave?Strat wrote:stop itLoathedVermin72 wrote:Return of the Jedi
The Empire Strikes Back
Rogue One
A New Hope
The Battle for Endor
Caravan of Courage
The Phantom Menace
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
The Last Jedi
Solo
The Force Awakens