Page 10 of 23

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sat July 09, 2016 7:35 pm
by BurtReynolds
Wake me up when they make Bones gay. Then all my fanfiction will become canon.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sat July 09, 2016 7:41 pm
by bart
Image

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sat July 09, 2016 7:50 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sun July 10, 2016 5:03 am
by McParadigm
bart wrote:Image
I just watch that episode. Absolutely no way everybody involved didn't see what that was.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sun July 10, 2016 12:12 pm
by bart
McParadigm wrote:
bart wrote:Image
I just watch that episode. Absolutely now way everybody involved didn't see what that was.
Penis Rock of the Mind

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sun July 10, 2016 12:26 pm
by dimejinky99
I don't get Takeis objections at all but for myself it just smacks of tokenism.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sun July 10, 2016 5:26 pm
by epilogue
dimejinky99 wrote:I don't get Takeis objections at all but for myself it just smacks of tokenism.
I side with Simon Pegg on the issue of whether its tokenism or not.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Fri July 22, 2016 11:25 am
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 11:36 pm
by epilogue
Star Trek TV series to have a female lead:

http://www.ew.com/article/2016/08/10/st ... ow_twitter

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 11:47 pm
by Jorge
Ridley Boyega are gone and no Kenobi film so.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu August 11, 2016 2:04 pm
by bada
I wonder if they will stick with the same cast season to season or jump around the timeline.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sat August 27, 2016 4:27 am
by BurtReynolds
ugh forgot about Worf's annoying kid.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Sat August 27, 2016 1:35 pm
by bada
Image

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 2:57 pm
by epilogue
CBS's Star Trek: Discovery series is being pushed back to May.

No surprise.

Probably a damn good thing.

Imagine we'll see it pushed back even further to September.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 3:35 pm
by CopperTom
There's much less competition starting in May though.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 3:55 pm
by bada
Project feels doomed anyways. No one is going to get CBS All Access for one show. I don't want to get invested in something that is going to get cancelled.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 3:55 pm
by epilogue
Absolutely, CooperTim. But it's also a dumb time to try to relaunch a franchise. People are busier. They aren't home as often. I mean, I guess that's the good news about this being on a mobile/online platform. People will watch whenever. Still.

No cast. The show runner is splitting time with American Gods. I just think to give the thing it's best shot they need to give it some time. We'll see. For now, it's May. Perhaps it stays there. Perhaps it doesn't. I won't be surprised either way.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 3:56 pm
by epilogue
bada wrote:Project feels doomed anyways. No one is going to get CBS All Access for one show. I don't want to get invested in something that is going to get cancelled.
Isn't it going to be on Netflix like a day later or something? You don't have to get All Access.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 6:50 pm
by bada
It won't be on Netflix in the US or Canada. CBS Access only.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Posted: Thu September 15, 2016 7:33 pm
by epilogue
Ah. It'll be on Netflix eventually. I can wait.