Red Mosquito

blueviper wrote:this may be hard to believe, but the government can do more than one thing at a time.

BurtReynolds wrote:

blueviper wrote:this may be hard to believe, but the government can do more than one thing at a time.

I haven't seen much proof they can do one thing.

B wrote:

4/5 wrote:

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

B wrote: Someone should also point out that Republican-controlled state legislatures are not passing laws to reduce inflation or create jobs. They're passing laws to ban trans kids and micro-manage school libraries.

It appears your messaging may be failing to take hold with the masses.

Well, that's because the Democrats suck at this.

Democrats do suck at messaging, that's true. But economy/jobs/prices/inflation isn't a messaging fail, it's what people care about. Now whether people should perceive that those issues are at the top of the list of priorities of Democratic or Republican politicians I don't know. But it doesn't seem crazy to me that more people think that Jan 6/women's rights/environment/guns are higher priorities for Democratic legislators than economy/jobs/prices/inflation. Maybe that's a messaging fail, but if people are looking around at high inflation, decreasing real wages and purchasing power and believe that the party in power prioritizes other things, that's a problem for the party in power regardless of whether people are right or wrong.

Also, who are the 13% that think Republican leaders care about the national debt? L-O-L.

I don't disagree. But when we get into how do those concerns translate into voting, it becomes important to point out that the Republican strategy is to attack people based on social issues, and then when the Democrats defend those point, wail about how the Democrats are wasting all of their time on social issues that no one cares about.

That has an impact on how people feel when the pollsters call them.

BurtReynolds wrote:I haven't really followed it, this Pennsylvania race sounds like one of the top 5 dumbest things to ever happen.

BurtReynolds wrote:It's no effort to get weed

96583UP wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's no effort to get weed

we have yet to experience the full throttle effects of unbridled american finance on the weed market in the united states

tragabigzanda wrote:

96583UP wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's no effort to get weed

we have yet to experience the full throttle effects of unbridled american finance on the weed market in the united states

1. China wins

Bi_3 wrote:

96583UP wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's no effort to get weed

we have yet to experience the full throttle effects of unbridled american finance on the weed market in the united states

Just wait until they hear about sex workers.

96583UP wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

96583UP wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's no effort to get weed

we have yet to experience the full throttle effects of unbridled american finance on the weed market in the united states

Just wait until they hear about sex workers.

GOP loves (male) sex workers it’s also a win-win

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:I haven't really followed it, this Pennsylvania race sounds like one of the top 5 dumbest things to ever happen.

Fetterman had his stroke around the time he won the primary, so maybe there was no provision to replace him? Clearly the PA Democratic Party has known since May that he is in no condition to serve.

BurtReynolds wrote:I haven't really followed it, this Pennsylvania race sounds like one of the top 5 dumbest things to ever happen.