Page 10 of 15
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Fri January 29, 2016 5:30 pm
by Teeeeeekay
I find it kind of amusing.
I've seen him solo, with a band on guitar and drums, now I'm very excited to see him just as a front man.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Fri January 29, 2016 7:36 pm
by chewm
Teeeeeekay wrote:tommymtcom wrote:Just gave this guy a shot - really digging The Singer and Man Man.
Manipulator is a very bright spot in his catalog.
Listening to Manipulator, first thing I ever listen from him, great stuff.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Fri January 29, 2016 8:00 pm
by Teeeeeekay
Nice.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Fri January 29, 2016 10:12 pm
by zeb
I celebrate the guy's entire catalog.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 5:44 am
by Teeeeeekay
zeb wrote:I celebrate the guy's entire catalog.
It really is a tremendous I effort. The S/T album has been getting huge amount of play time here.
Zeb, you've got Gemini correct?
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 7:12 am
by zeb
Yeahhhhh
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 1:58 pm
by Teeeeeekay
That one is near the top for me too. Especially after I read the liner notes where Neil Young was thanked.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 8:56 pm
by super nintendo chalmers
i can't be the only one who think we've achieved peak Ty here, people?
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 10:41 pm
by Teeeeeekay
In what way?
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sat January 30, 2016 11:23 pm
by super nintendo chalmers
Peak meaning over-saturated. I've hit my limit. Guess I'm just growing bored and or indifferent towards his music.
Finally got around to listening to this Wand record, 1000 Days that I've had for a few weeks after picking it up in SF. Really like it, more than I expected.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sun January 31, 2016 12:42 am
by Teeeeeekay
I guess he mixes it up just enough for me to keep enjoying. I respect his work ethic, his genuine joy for the art, and his output is pretty top notch. Lots of quality.
1,000 Days is a pretty great record. Love Wand.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sun January 31, 2016 10:40 am
by zeb
super nintendo chalmers wrote:Peak meaning over-saturated. I've hit my limit. Guess I'm just growing bored and or indifferent towards his music.
I don't know how to feel about this.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sun January 31, 2016 5:11 pm
by super nintendo chalmers
zeb wrote:super nintendo chalmers wrote:Peak meaning over-saturated. I've hit my limit. Guess I'm just growing bored and or indifferent towards his music.
I don't know how to feel about this.
I know, right? The last records I really enjoyed were Slaughterhouse and Sleeper, and that Live in SF record rips. I don't know, I think I've heard everything he has to offer by this point. He's a super nice dude and the music
doesn't suck, its just more me than him at this point.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Sun January 31, 2016 6:08 pm
by likeatab
first full listen through. guitar work at the end of diversion is a highlight so far. definitely sounds a bit weirder than he's done in the past - i dig it.
got a ticket to see the man for the second time on 2/19, excited. first time i caught him was on the Sleeper tour, looking forward to seeing him cut loose a bit more with electric stuff.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 6:56 pm
by Teeeeeekay
http://pitchfork.com/news/63295-ty-sega ... sic-video/
If for anything there's some cool remixes that act as the "score" of the film/video.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 11:12 pm
by bodysnatcher
super nintendo chalmers wrote:zeb wrote:super nintendo chalmers wrote:Peak meaning over-saturated. I've hit my limit. Guess I'm just growing bored and or indifferent towards his music.
I don't know how to feel about this.
I know, right? The last records I really enjoyed were Slaughterhouse and Sleeper, and that Live in SF record rips. I don't know, I think I've heard everything he has to offer by this point. He's a super nice dude and the music
doesn't suck, its just more me than him at this point.
i see where SNC is coming from. same thing happened with Guided By Voices for me. at some point, being prolific becomes overwhelming for the consumer
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 11:16 pm
by BurtReynolds
I have a hard time getting into him for some reason. It seems like I would love him, but I don't. I liked the first Fuzz album, but I don't feel like revisiting it.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 11:18 pm
by BurtReynolds
Maybe I'll do a Ty Segall marathon today.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Wed February 03, 2016 1:24 am
by zeb
This will be the most productive thing you do all day.
Re: Ty Segall
Posted: Wed February 03, 2016 1:25 am
by BurtReynolds
I'll get to him after my Debbie Gibson/Tiffany double feature.