Red Mosquito

stip wrote:we asked for a copy to review for TheskyIscrape. Sadly we did not get one. But KNAC.com did

stip wrote:

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:I'm sorry to be mean but that is one of the worst written reviews I've ever read

It reads like a very long post on a Pearl Jam forum

I think there's two things I want out of a review, depending on whether or not the music is out/I can access it. if something is already out, I read reviews for insights into the album - deeper dives into themes, descriptions of the music that help unlock what I'm hearing that I may not be able to fully process, or phrasing that puts it into words better than I could do. I look for a review to enhance my experience of the album.

Prior to an album coming out I mostly want detailed descriptions of how a song physically sounds - either through direct descriptions or, failing that (or supplementing it) connections to prior catalog moments as short hand.

I only read that review once. It didn't do the former, but I feel like I walked out of it with a more robust understanding of what to expect next.

Mike wrote:

stip wrote:we asked for a copy to review for TheskyIscrape. Sadly we did not get one. But KNAC.com did

what the hell

Jorge wrote:

stip wrote:

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:I'm sorry to be mean but that is one of the worst written reviews I've ever read

It reads like a very long post on a Pearl Jam forum

I think there's two things I want out of a review, depending on whether or not the music is out/I can access it. if something is already out, I read reviews for insights into the album - deeper dives into themes, descriptions of the music that help unlock what I'm hearing that I may not be able to fully process, or phrasing that puts it into words better than I could do. I look for a review to enhance my experience of the album.

Prior to an album coming out I mostly want detailed descriptions of how a song physically sounds - either through direct descriptions or, failing that (or supplementing it) connections to prior catalog moments as short hand.

I only read that review once. It didn't do the former, but I feel like I walked out of it with a more robust understanding of what to expect next.

I'm just judging it as a piece of writing. It's awful

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:

stip wrote:

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:I'm sorry to be mean but that is one of the worst written reviews I've ever read

It reads like a very long post on a Pearl Jam forum

I think there's two things I want out of a review, depending on whether or not the music is out/I can access it. if something is already out, I read reviews for insights into the album - deeper dives into themes, descriptions of the music that help unlock what I'm hearing that I may not be able to fully process, or phrasing that puts it into words better than I could do. I look for a review to enhance my experience of the album.

Prior to an album coming out I mostly want detailed descriptions of how a song physically sounds - either through direct descriptions or, failing that (or supplementing it) connections to prior catalog moments as short hand.

I only read that review once. It didn't do the former, but I feel like I walked out of it with a more robust understanding of what to expect next.

I'm just judging it as a piece of writing. It's awful

Now read this one https://knac.com/article.asp?ArticleID=48948 for a real one two punch

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:

stip wrote:

Mike wrote:

Jorge wrote:I'm sorry to be mean but that is one of the worst written reviews I've ever read

It reads like a very long post on a Pearl Jam forum

I think there's two things I want out of a review, depending on whether or not the music is out/I can access it. if something is already out, I read reviews for insights into the album - deeper dives into themes, descriptions of the music that help unlock what I'm hearing that I may not be able to fully process, or phrasing that puts it into words better than I could do. I look for a review to enhance my experience of the album.

Prior to an album coming out I mostly want detailed descriptions of how a song physically sounds - either through direct descriptions or, failing that (or supplementing it) connections to prior catalog moments as short hand.

I only read that review once. It didn't do the former, but I feel like I walked out of it with a more robust understanding of what to expect next.

I'm just judging it as a piece of writing. It's awful

Now read this one https://knac.com/article.asp?ArticleID=48948 for a real one two punch

Jesus. That whole COVID rant at the beginning made me not read the actual review.

Ms Harmless wrote:haha the metal door leak made us think we had no more punkers and now we have possibly three

tragabigzanda wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"Fast, punky & chunky"
"his fingers are off-leash and in a dog fight against the fretboard"
"Andrew Watt was a much needed change as producer. He simplified their process and pushed electrified creativity"

That last one is for trag. Trag, it isn't bad production, it's just electrified creativity!

that's actually Mrs. Trag's name for me in the bedroom

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"Fast, punky & chunky"
"his fingers are off-leash and in a dog fight against the fretboard"
"Andrew Watt was a much needed change as producer. He simplified their process and pushed electrified creativity"

tragabigzanda wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"Fast, punky & chunky"
"his fingers are off-leash and in a dog fight against the fretboard"
"Andrew Watt was a much needed change as producer. He simplified their process and pushed electrified creativity"

That last one is for trag. Trag, it isn't bad production, it's just electrified creativity!

that's actually Mrs. Trag's name for me in the bedroom

jump-started* is not the same as electrified

what are you implying?!

Birds in Hell wrote: The band are going to read these reviews and never make another tolerable record again.

I had almost the exact same though, we're at the beginning of the end

stip wrote: most of my reviews start with long meta-tangents