Page 10 of 12
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 10:41 pm
by epilogue
I'm worried about you, buddy
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 10:48 pm
by Ello Sailor
If you were worth worrying about, I'd say the same. Performative dumbass.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 10:50 pm
by epilogue
Good thing you care so much and watches the W!
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 11:05 pm
by Ello Sailor
I watch a lot of women's sport, but something about "tHe W!" fans put me right off. Maybe you're just a terrible example, but it's a definite yikes.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 11:05 pm
by epilogue
That's probably it, yeah.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 11:50 pm
by Bammer
Ello Sailor wrote: Sat August 08, 2026 10:08 pm
How is it her fault that she got elbowed in the face super fucking hard mid-flight? That's actual victim blaming.
You've lost your damn mind.
Durden - if anyone can appreciate staying committed to a schtick, it’s me.
But this - can’t explain it. I think you are just next level schticking.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 08, 2026 11:56 pm
by epilogue
It's not a schtick, bro.
But thanks for commenting on something you don't even watch or care about.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sun August 09, 2026 2:16 am
by Bammer
If watching W basketball is a requirement to post in this thread, see ya.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sun August 09, 2026 2:38 am
by epilogue
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 12:29 am
by Bammer
epilogue wrote: Sun August 09, 2026 2:38 am
Is that a wave hello?
Or a wave goodbye, like, not being inclusive?
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 1:21 am
by epilogue
It sounded like you wanted to leave, so I was supporting your decision.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 3:30 am
by Bammer
It sounded like you were gatekeeping the thread you didn’t start, so I was just seeing if you were an inclusive person or not.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 4:07 am
by Bammer
I’d also love to see some data on what percentage of the time a player who absorbs a Flagrant 2 on a shooting foul actually makes the shot because that was impressive.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 1:19 pm
by epilogue
Your obsession with who started a thread is never going to stop being utterly baffling.
But anyway, I would love larger participation in this thread. Especially if it's thoughtful and/or in good faith.
I just thought Ello's previous exchange was weird given that he says he doesn't even watch or like the league and it's fans.
Okay, so if you don't like it, and you don't watch it, why do you want to participate in the conversation? Is it to learn something? Is it to try and find a way into the fandom? Is it because you like talking with the people who are taking about it? Is it to troll? Is it to minimize and belittle something that others enjoy? Is it to post about women you'd be willing to fuck even though they probably wouldn't want to fuck you?
There's no gatekeeping, I just wonder why in certain cases.
Like I hate MLB. I don't watch it, I don't follow it, and so I don't find reasons to go into that thread very often.
I don't know. Just different posting styles and philosophies. You do you, though. It's just as easy to ignore a post / conversation as it is to stay out of a thread. So, really this is on me. I shouldn't have engaged the way that I did. My bad.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Mon August 10, 2026 1:22 pm
by epilogue
Anyway, I watched Marinne Johannes drop 7 threes at Barclays Center yesterday and thought, 'well that's the coolest thing I'll see today.'
Then Kayla McBride set the league record with 10 threes in a single game!
Man, the fucking Lynx. They're like Schrodinger's Team. It's impossible to love them and it's impossible to hate them.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Tue August 11, 2026 11:10 am
by spike
epilogue wrote: Sat August 08, 2026 8:56 pm
Looks like another full goddamn week of Sophie Cunningham in our feeds...
So sick of her.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Tue August 11, 2026 12:22 pm
by BurtReynolds
Re: WNBA
Posted: Tue August 11, 2026 1:21 pm
by epilogue
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 15, 2026 7:33 pm
by taffer
Do you really think it's okay for trans men to compete against women?
Have you ever seen the opposite, where trans women compete against men?
If you really want trans people to compete against someone, create a separate league for trans athletes so they can compete against each other, like paralympians do.
Re: WNBA
Posted: Sat August 15, 2026 8:37 pm
by epilogue
We aren't talking about trans men competing against women. We're talking about trans women being allowed to compete with other women.
I fully support trans men also being allowed to compete in men's sports, yes.
If we created a "Trans League" it would be a men v men league and a separate women v women league. Sound familiar?
Also, if you want to discuss trans issues I direct you toward the Trans Rights thread that we have (
https://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?t=16249) in the N&D forum.