Page 10 of 27

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Wed October 01, 2014 4:00 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
McParadigm wrote:Saw it at the redbox, but it's a goddamn Tuesday buddy.
Surprised they had any in stock with its popularity and all.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Wed October 01, 2014 5:47 pm
by epilogue
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:i'm sure this movie will be another triumph of cerebralism over artistry, at the expense of the wordless, sui generis potential for expression afforded by the medium of film
You're right. Movies are too smart these days. I'm sick of turning my brain on at all. Why can't there be more movies that are just idiotic but really well crafted and pretty?
there are damn smart movies that could function just as well as plays given the camera's status as a non-entity, and the reliance on dialogue and staging as the sole facets of craft. but are those great films or great screenplays?
Can't they be both?
they can, but will they always?
Oh heavens no. They won't even usually.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Wed October 01, 2014 5:56 pm
by Alex
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:i'm sure this movie will be another triumph of cerebralism over artistry, at the expense of the wordless, sui generis potential for expression afforded by the medium of film
You're right. Movies are too smart these days. I'm sick of turning my brain on at all. Why can't there be more movies that are just idiotic but really well crafted and pretty?
there are damn smart movies that could function just as well as plays given the camera's status as a non-entity, and the reliance on dialogue and staging as the sole facets of craft. but are those great films or great screenplays?
Can't they be both?
they can, but will they always?
Oh heavens no. They won't even usually.
now the eyes of your eyes are opened

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Wed October 01, 2014 5:59 pm
by epilogue
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:i'm sure this movie will be another triumph of cerebralism over artistry, at the expense of the wordless, sui generis potential for expression afforded by the medium of film
You're right. Movies are too smart these days. I'm sick of turning my brain on at all. Why can't there be more movies that are just idiotic but really well crafted and pretty?
there are damn smart movies that could function just as well as plays given the camera's status as a non-entity, and the reliance on dialogue and staging as the sole facets of craft. but are those great films or great screenplays?
Can't they be both?
they can, but will they always?
Oh heavens no. They won't even usually.
now the eyes of your eyes are opened
but now the anus of my anus itches

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Wed October 01, 2014 9:02 pm
by Alex
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:i'm sure this movie will be another triumph of cerebralism over artistry, at the expense of the wordless, sui generis potential for expression afforded by the medium of film
You're right. Movies are too smart these days. I'm sick of turning my brain on at all. Why can't there be more movies that are just idiotic but really well crafted and pretty?
there are damn smart movies that could function just as well as plays given the camera's status as a non-entity, and the reliance on dialogue and staging as the sole facets of craft. but are those great films or great screenplays?
Can't they be both?
they can, but will they always?
Oh heavens no. They won't even usually.
now the eyes of your eyes are opened
but now the anus of my anus itches
do you like federico fellini?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 1:50 pm
by epilogue
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Alex wrote:i'm sure this movie will be another triumph of cerebralism over artistry, at the expense of the wordless, sui generis potential for expression afforded by the medium of film
You're right. Movies are too smart these days. I'm sick of turning my brain on at all. Why can't there be more movies that are just idiotic but really well crafted and pretty?
there are damn smart movies that could function just as well as plays given the camera's status as a non-entity, and the reliance on dialogue and staging as the sole facets of craft. but are those great films or great screenplays?
Can't they be both?
they can, but will they always?
Oh heavens no. They won't even usually.
now the eyes of your eyes are opened
but now the anus of my anus itches
do you like federico fellini?
Like most people, of course I do.

And like most people, I've never seen any of his films.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 1:55 pm
by dimejinky99
new trailer

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 2:34 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Was that a giant wave?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 3:54 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Was that a giant wave?
Did you watch the trailer without sound?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 4:03 pm
by McParadigm
I did, but I sang Mind Heist at the top of my lungs while I did it. Does that count?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 4:04 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Was that a giant wave?
Did you watch the trailer without sound?
Of course

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 4:04 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Was that a giant wave?
Did you watch the trailer without sound?
Of course
Then, yes. It's a giant wave.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 4:27 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Was that a giant wave?
Did you watch the trailer without sound?
Of course
Then, yes. It's a giant wave.
I hope mconaghey's character boards up and surfs that bad boy!

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 4:41 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Was that a giant wave?
Did you watch the trailer without sound?
Of course
Then, yes. It's a giant wave.
I hope mconaghey's character boards up and surfs that bad boy!
So you didn't even WATCH the trailer!

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 5:46 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
How did I know it was a wave then?!

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 5:47 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
d,t has been sassing me a lot lately. All because I don't like one thread that he likes.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 5:51 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:d,t has been sassing me a lot lately. All because I don't like one thread that he likes.
It's just because I finally feel like we're friends.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 5:55 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:d,t has been sassing me a lot lately. All because I don't like one thread that he likes.
It's just because I finally feel like we're friends.
I draft this post

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 6:30 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:d,t has been sassing me a lot lately. All because I don't like one thread that he likes.
It's just because I finally feel like we're friends.
I draft this post
:luv:

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Thu October 02, 2014 7:22 pm
by Rangi Guy
So that scene in the new trailer where it shows them first walking on a new planet - is that some type of minecraft creation walking next to McConaughey?