Page 10 of 47

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:12 pm
by Jorge
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Guys Walk Hard is great but I fail to see how it's relevant
Reference
So wait, was this an intentional joking callback? Or did you forget and get them mixed up again?
It was meant to be a callback but now it's ruined, thanks

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:13 pm
by LoathedVermin72
theplatypus wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Guys Walk Hard is great but I fail to see how it's relevant
Reference
So wait, was this an intentional joking callback? Or did you forget and get them mixed up again?
It was meant to be a callback but now it's ruined, thanks
that joke was too esoteric

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:14 pm
by Jorge
I operate under the assumption that RM remembers every post I've ever made.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:14 pm
by LoathedVermin72
clearly

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:17 pm
by Jorge
Cool, well... see you later

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:18 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Great

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:19 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
theplatypus wrote:Cool, well... see you later
toodles

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:23 pm
by bune
Image

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 4:29 pm
by Strat
this is going to be terrible.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 5:16 pm
by Strat
Yeah you know I, we all do a cameo in the movie. Me, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Annie Potts. It's a great script, the girls are really funny, they have a great camaraderie and chemistry that I think is going to come through on screen, and I think a lot of the criticism will go away once they see the movie because I think the movie is going to be pretty extraordinary.


Ernie Hudson.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 5:18 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Paul Feig

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 5:19 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 5:20 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 5:29 pm
by LoathedVermin72
tragabigzanda wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Paul Feig
Did you like Freaks & Geeks?
I've only seen bits and pieces. It seemed fine but I'm not interested in watching more.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 7:39 pm
by Strat
http://collider.com/ghostbusters-new-trailer/

better but im still not interested.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:34 am
by B
For people who want to stay in the thread.


Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:01 am
by Mecca
wow...

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:03 am
by BurtReynolds
my god that does look stunningly awful

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:11 am
by Mecca
BurtReynolds wrote:my god that does look stunningly awful
no, im just surprised i never thought of using leslie jones to carry the dothraki across the sea

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:14 am
by BurtReynolds
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:my god that does look stunningly awful
no, im just surprised i never thought of using leslie jones to carry the dothraki across the sea
That George R.R. Martin sure is something.