Page 91 of 508

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 7:42 pm
by epilogue
bada wrote:Image
Yeah, I think this one's better.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:26 pm
by Mecca
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:Yeah, but in a show with a ton of source material to work with, they just show this kid a bit too much for my liking.
Ollie becomes king on the iron throne in the books
Yeah, use the spoiler tag. Don't know if it's true or not, but there's a thread for spoilers from the book.
Are you being serious right now?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:36 pm
by Coach
Mecca wrote:
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:Yeah, but in a show with a ton of source material to work with, they just show this kid a bit too much for my liking.
Ollie becomes king on the iron throne in the books
Yeah, use the spoiler tag. Don't know if it's true or not, but there's a thread for spoilers from the book.
Are you being serious right now?
Based on your response, I'll assume you were kidding and I'm being overly sensitive and perhaps a bit naive. Still, I've been spoiled by others in this thread via book talk, so, hence, my heightened sense of paranoia.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:46 pm
by Mecca
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:Yeah, but in a show with a ton of source material to work with, they just show this kid a bit too much for my liking.
Ollie becomes king on the iron throne in the books
Yeah, use the spoiler tag. Don't know if it's true or not, but there's a thread for spoilers from the book.
Are you being serious right now?
Based on your response, I'll assume you were kidding and I'm being overly sensitive and perhaps a bit naive. Still, I've been spoiled by others in this thread via book talk, so, hence, my heightened sense of paranoia.
im not paaks

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:48 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:52 pm
by @SkitchP
#TeamCoach

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:52 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:53 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 8:57 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.
Check your pms

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 9:51 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.
Check your pms
0 new messages.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 10:19 pm
by Norah
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.
Check your pms
0 new messages.
He was talking about your cramps and irritability.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 10:33 pm
by bada
durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:Image
Yeah, I think this one's better.
Yeah I blew it.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 10:39 pm
by epilogue
bada wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:Image
Yeah, I think this one's better.
Yeah I blew it.
Step it up, pal.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 10:59 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
cutuphalfdead wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.
Check your pms
0 new messages.
He was talking about your cramps and irritability.
Meetup: off

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 10:59 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm with Coach, though. You guys that read the books can't come in here and make stuff up and not at least spoiler it. We who have not read the book have no idea if you are serious or not so why shouldn't we take it as serious? Fair play, team.
Because the notion was so ridiculous
Umm, welcome to the Game of Thrones.
Check your pms
0 new messages.
He was talking about your cramps and irritability.
Meetup: off
:thumbsup:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 11:10 pm
by zeb
Mecca wrote:im not paaks
I can't even remember what that guy said. Did he spoil something that has since happened in the television show or something that is yet to happen?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 11:25 pm
by Mecca
zeb wrote:
Mecca wrote:im not paaks
I can't even remember what that guy said. Did he spoil something that has since happened in the television show or something that is yet to happen?
something that isn't referenced in the show yet

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 11:26 pm
by Norah
Mecca wrote:
zeb wrote:
Mecca wrote:im not paaks
I can't even remember what that guy said. Did he spoil something that has since happened in the television show or something that is yet to happen?
something that isn't referenced in the show yet
Spoiler: show
stoneheart?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 11:26 pm
by Simple Torture
Mecca wrote:
zeb wrote:
Mecca wrote:im not paaks
I can't even remember what that guy said. Did he spoil something that has since happened in the television show or something that is yet to happen?
something that isn't referenced in the show yet
Post it in the book thread for us.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 27, 2015 3:48 am
by spike
you spoilerphobes are even more zealous than the sparrows