Re: Anybody want a Corona?
Posted: Wed August 03, 2022 6:18 pm
The lesson of this page is that if you come at bart, you better bring it… better luck next time, Matters.
Oh yeah?simple schoolboy wrote:This is funnily something a primary opponent could hit Trump with - it was reckless fasttrack a leaky vaccine that then could be mandated.Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.
Pretty sure he’s got a lock on the “anti vax as a cause” crowd anyway.Coach wrote:Oh yeah?simple schoolboy wrote:This is funnily something a primary opponent could hit Trump with - it was reckless fasttrack a leaky vaccine that then could be mandated.Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.
His supporters have a fair amount of cognitive dissonance on this, but if he was forced to defend project warpspeed and the effectiveness of the vaccine as it exists, something would have to give.Rob wrote:Pretty sure he’s got a lock on the “anti vax as a cause” crowd anyway.Coach wrote:Oh yeah?simple schoolboy wrote:This is funnily something a primary opponent could hit Trump with - it was reckless fasttrack a leaky vaccine that then could be mandated.Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.
simple schoolboy wrote:His supporters have a fair amount of cognitive dissonance on this, but if he was forced to defend project warpspeed and the effectiveness of the vaccine as it exists, something would have to give.Rob wrote:Pretty sure he’s got a lock on the “anti vax as a cause” crowd anyway.Coach wrote:Oh yeah?simple schoolboy wrote:This is funnily something a primary opponent could hit Trump with - it was reckless fasttrack a leaky vaccine that then could be mandated.Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.

The virus is not potentially deadly to the majority of those being required to take the shot.elliseamos wrote:I'm sorry, what is the problem with requiring vaccines against potentially deadly viruses?
Since we're getting hypothetical let's also assume that another virus in anyone's kid's future is even more deadly.
I could care less who the president was when it was developed. You think this is political to me?Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.
Yes let’s all rally behind blatant false arguments.Rob wrote:The lesson of this page is that if you come at bart, you better bring it… better luck next time, Matters.
Read it again and remember that vaccines aren't solely about those that don't need them to be safe, they're about people that need them to be safe and can't get them... thereby placing their safety in the hands of other people.Matters wrote:The virus is not potentially deadly to the majority of those being required to take the shot.elliseamos wrote:I'm sorry, what is the problem with requiring vaccines against potentially deadly viruses?
Since we're getting hypothetical let's also assume that another virus in anyone's kid's future is even more deadly.
They have this rule to do what's best for all their patients, not just your son. Weird how there's other people in the world beyond you and yours.Matters wrote:My son was recently denied health care because he hasn’t taken any covid shots.
100%Matters wrote:My son was recently denied health care because he hasn’t taken any covid shots.
He is 6 years old.
He is being denied care from doctors who swore an oath, simply because he hasn’t had shots that offer him no benefit. He’s already had covid. He experienced mild flu symptoms and got better within 2 days. As we all know by now the shots are unable to prevent transmission, so he put absolutely no one at risk by not being injected.
Please take a step back and ask yourselves if you are down with this.
First, what "healthcare" was he denied?Peeps wrote:100%Matters wrote:My son was recently denied health care because he hasn’t taken any covid shots.
He is 6 years old.
He is being denied care from doctors who swore an oath, simply because he hasn’t had shots that offer him no benefit. He’s already had covid. He experienced mild flu symptoms and got better within 2 days. As we all know by now the shots are unable to prevent transmission, so he put absolutely no one at risk by not being injected.
Please take a step back and ask yourselves if you are down with this.
Protection for me, false sense of security for thee.elliseamos wrote:In general, what are vaccines for, bammer?
Yup, and with just one more step:Bammer wrote:Protection for me, false sense of security for thee.elliseamos wrote:In general, what are vaccines for, bammer?
also the vaccine reduces the severity of covid but why let facts get in the way of being a jackasselliseamos wrote:Yup, and with just one more step:Bammer wrote:Protection for me, false sense of security for thee.elliseamos wrote:In general, what are vaccines for, bammer?
As long as the vast majority of people are vaccinated, it is much more difficult for an outbreak of disease to occur, let alone spread. This effect is called herd immunity.
*couldn'tMatters wrote:I could* care less who the president was when it was developed. You think this is political to me?Coach wrote:If only the vax was developed under a Republican president....oh wait.
The Food and Drug Administration is expected to authorize new Covid-19 booster shots this week without a staple of its normal decision-making process: data from a study showing whether the shots were safe and worked in humans.