Page 93 of 555
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 5:17 am
by BurtReynolds
"Am I out of touch? How can I reach the common man? I know! My slaves--er I mean--employees tell me how much they love being crammed in their overcrowded, privacy free, distraction heavy work space! I'll tweet about that! They'll love me!"
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 8:58 am
by bune
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 2:41 pm
by 96583UP
verb_to_trust wrote:96583UP wrote:and big ball market traders who sit on the trade floor with their traders
Just give it up dude
he’s not a bad guy
might even be batman for all we know
and old, jewish batman
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 2:44 pm
by Bi_3
We need someone who can actually run things team... it’s basically bloomy or bust
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 5:28 pm
by verb_to_trust
Literally the only pro Bloomberg people I've encountered post on RM.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 5:34 pm
by epilogue
Bi_3 wrote:We need someone who can actually run things team... it’s basically bloomy or bust
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 5:58 pm
by Orpheus
Bi_3 wrote:We need someone who can actually run things team... it’s basically bloomy or bust
Jesus christ imagine being this out of touch.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 6:09 pm
by Bi_3
Orpheus wrote:Bi_3 wrote:We need someone who can actually run things team... it’s basically bloomy or bust
Jesus christ imagine being this out of touch.
You should consider what is important, and that is dethroning Trump.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 6:22 pm
by verb_to_trust
Bloomberg isn't even polling well
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 6:50 pm
by McParadigm
This is bordering on trolling
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 7:18 pm
by Orpheus
Bet big on this horse, man says about horse that literally no one likes.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 11:28 pm
by 96583UP
taking one for the team
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... utType=amp
Bloomberg is self-funding his campaign and said he will not accept campaign donations. The Democratic National Committee had set a polling and donor threshold for candidates to qualify for the debate.
On Friday, the DNC increased the number of donations necessary to qualify for the next debate, meaning Bloomberg again will not qualify. He told reporters on Friday that he is sticking to his policy of rejecting donations and abiding by the DNC’s donor threshold rules that bar him from debate.
I want to get out my message to the extent I can. I’d be happy to compare myself to anybody else. But if they have rules that do not let me compete, then I just can’t,” Bloomberg said.
“I’m spending a lot of money, but my investment is to keep Donald Trump from being a president the next time,” he added. “Some of these candidates criticized me for spending a lot of money. I think you want me to spend less to get rid of Donald Trump? I didn’t think so. But you know, if they change the rules I’ll do it. And if they don’t, they don’t.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 11:33 pm
by 96583UP
maybe he just has to keep up the fascade of running so he can still qualify to buy attack ads at discount rates (since he is self funding there are laws in place to allow cheap air time)
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 11:37 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
96583UP wrote:maybe he just has to keep up the fascade of running so he can still qualify to buy attack ads at discount rates (since he is self funding there are laws in place to allow cheap air time)
Pretty sure that's all he's doing. I'm not sure he's serious about running
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 11:39 pm
by 96583UP
quotes like this are really making it look that way
“I’m spending a lot of money, but my investment is to keep Donald Trump from being a president the next time,” he added. “Some of these candidates criticized me for spending a lot of money. I think you want me to spend less to get rid of Donald Trump? I didn’t think so. But you know, if they change the rules I’ll do it. And if they don’t, they don’t.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Wed January 01, 2020 11:42 pm
by 96583UP
McParadigm wrote:This is bordering on trolling
correct, it is clear now -
Bloomberg is trolling Trump
this is a $500 million trolling campaign
the guy is worth over $50 Billion
stock market went up 30% this year alone
Bloomberg can shave off a fraction of this year’s returns for his hobby of attacking DJT
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Thu January 02, 2020 12:39 am
by Bi_3
Orpheus wrote:Bet big on this horse, man says about horse that literally no one likes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/us/p ... round.html
We have to beat trump in November
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Thu January 02, 2020 1:29 am
by McParadigm
One minute he’s saying Bloomy or Bust, the next he’s posting polling data that supports a Biden/Warren ticket.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Thu January 02, 2020 1:42 am
by Bi_3
McParadigm wrote:One minute he’s saying Bloomy or Bust, the next he’s posting polling data that supports a Biden/Warren ticket.
The polling data us from prior to Bman’s announcement and is used to show the importance of middle of the road candidates in defeating Trump.
Re: Election 2020
Posted: Thu January 02, 2020 1:47 am
by SunKing
Bi_3 wrote:McParadigm wrote:One minute he’s saying Bloomy or Bust, the next he’s posting polling data that supports a Biden/Warren ticket.
The polling data us from prior to Bman’s announcement and is used to show the importance of middle of the road candidates in defeating Trump.
Does it show that? Or does it show that, with the election over a year away, the highest polling candidate is the previous Dem VP, as might be expected based on the simple fact of name recognition?
