Red Mosquito

You forgot the part where he went to another state with a gun and went into a protest area. This isn't a kid looking for something peaceful.

*edit - nevermind. The fact that some of you think him going to another state with a firearm and into a protest area to "help keep the peace" is justifiable makes me realize I won't win this argument. Carry on.

that kid needs to just go the fuck to school. plenty of time to be a vigilante later.

hes a thug in a gang. Enough of this militia vigilante bullshit.

McParadigm wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:this is just advertising for BLM. Did BLM need advertising at this point in time? Is there anyone in America who does know what BLM means and what it generally stands for? Though as you said it doesn't have any unified goals or objectives.

Societal change movements famously achieve maximum branding exposure and then just sit around waiting to happen.

Or they grow and thrive on public showings of support which help to combat the opposing establishment narrative that they are fringe movements and not, in fact, popular.

I can’t remember which.

I am not in the US but are you trying to tell me that BLM is seen as a fringe movement? It is certainly not depicted that way in any media I've come across.

This is an avenue I’d be curious to explore, not to make a point but to get some clarity for myself:

1. What is your impression, from the outside looking in, of what the republican party position is on BLM? This is a (broadly speaking) ruling party aiming for re-election. Would you describe their messaging as indicative of a recognition that the movement has majority support? Or would you say they more generally frame it as a problematic minority group?

2. Do American Conservative posters here...macphisto in particular...consider BLM to be a movement with a majority support in America?

1. I think it depends which Republican you speak to.

Trump is trash and thinks BLM is all about looting and rioting. I don't think he hears or cares about their message. He goes through life making others feel small in order to try and look/feel bigger.

The Republican party as a whole, I think they think BLM is a distraction from what matters, building a strong economy. An economy that favors the rich and does not care about inequality. They firmly believe in the all boats rising crap. They definitely downplay or ignore the lasting consequences of racism and systematic racism. They believe that defund the police, especially those voices in BLM who say defund the police means abolish the polish are nut jobs to be dismissed as nut jobs. They view the solution to BLM related rioting and looting is heavy handed application of law and order., not seeing that is just throwing gas on the fire. They bemoan the lack of respect for public institutions and police. They view systematic racism to not exist as there are not many if any blatantly racist laws. They are very nationalistic so they don't necessary equate "shit hole country" comments as racist as they view it about the country rather than the people.

Some individual Republicans probably do care about BLM and are not racist. I am sure they feel there voice is drowned out and do not feel encouraged to speak up at this time.

Democrats are viewed as concerned about the issue, maybe to an overriding extent, but that they are absolutely ineffective at making change. Obama having beers to resolve a minor incident while arming the police with para-military equipment.

I think huge strides were made between the 1950's and the 1970's and then things stagnated and rot set in. Teaching people to be color blind was admirable and best intentioned but it stopped there. That stoppage allowed rot to set in and that was evident in both parties. The crack down on welfare, the war on drugs and so much more. There is tons of change required and even properly implemented will take generations. Many of the issues aren't tied to race, such as social safety nets and public health care. There may be disparate impact but they are signs of an uncaring society. It's ridiculous to expect an uncaring society to care about BLM in a manner to exact change.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:You forgot the part where he went to another state with a gun and went into a protest area. This isn't a kid looking for something peaceful.

*edit - nevermind. The fact that some of you think him going to another state with a firearm and into a protest area to "help keep the peace" is justifiable makes me realize I won't win this argument. Carry on.

Actions can be terrible ideas without being criminal. His statement of purpose for being there was hopelessly naive. Responsible adults should keep their friends and family with undeveloped prefrontal cortexes far away from these sorts of protests, and this includes his attackers.

I would hope that state and local governments would stop abdicating their responsibility to maintain order to discourage this sort of activity.

That said, roof Korean type defense of property is 100% morally justified.

macphisto wrote:

Strat wrote:When white protestors storm the capital, or take over government buildings, nobody says "well whats the point, its just pandering"

Huh? "White protestors" are not a multi-billion dollar industry with a product to sell.

N

R

A

Gold.

surfndestroy wrote:abolish the polish

If only.

Simple Torture wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:abolish the polish

If only.

try enjoying a life without pierogi and sauerkraut...

Chris_H_2 wrote:

macphisto wrote:

Strat wrote:When white protestors storm the capital, or take over government buildings, nobody says "well whats the point, its just pandering"

Huh? "White protestors" are not a multi-billion dollar industry with a product to sell.

N

R

A

Ok, I’ll award you two points on that one because you just dunked all over me.

doug rr wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:abolish the polish

If only.

try enjoying a life without pierogi and sauerkraut...

I don't want to live in that world doug

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

doug rr wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:abolish the polish

If only.

try enjoying a life without pierogi and sauerkraut...

I don't want to live in that world doug

That's the world BLM wants. Ready to change your mind yet, ruddo? I've got some unscourced Instagram posts if you're interested.

surfndestroy wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:this is just advertising for BLM. Did BLM need advertising at this point in time? Is there anyone in America who does know what BLM means and what it generally stands for? Though as you said it doesn't have any unified goals or objectives.

Societal change movements famously achieve maximum branding exposure and then just sit around waiting to happen.

Or they grow and thrive on public showings of support which help to combat the opposing establishment narrative that they are fringe movements and not, in fact, popular.

I can’t remember which.

I am not in the US but are you trying to tell me that BLM is seen as a fringe movement? It is certainly not depicted that way in any media I've come across.

This is an avenue I’d be curious to explore, not to make a point but to get some clarity for myself:

1. What is your impression, from the outside looking in, of what the republican party position is on BLM? This is a (broadly speaking) ruling party aiming for re-election. Would you describe their messaging as indicative of a recognition that the movement has majority support? Or would you say they more generally frame it as a problematic minority group?

2. Do American Conservative posters here...macphisto in particular...consider BLM to be a movement with a majority support in America?

1. I think it depends which Republican you speak to.

Trump is trash and thinks BLM is all about looting and rioting. I don't think he hears or cares about their message. He goes through life making others feel small in order to try and look/feel bigger.

The Republican party as a whole, I think they think BLM is a distraction from what matters, building a strong economy. An economy that favors the rich and does not care about inequality. They firmly believe in the all boats rising crap. They definitely downplay or ignore the lasting consequences of racism and systematic racism. They believe that defund the police, especially those voices in BLM who say defund the police means abolish the polish are nut jobs to be dismissed as nut jobs. They view the solution to BLM related rioting and looting is heavy handed application of law and order., not seeing that is just throwing gas on the fire. They bemoan the lack of respect for public institutions and police. They view systematic racism to not exist as there are not many if any blatantly racist laws. They are very nationalistic so they don't necessary equate "shit hole country" comments as racist as they view it about the country rather than the people.

Some individual Republicans probably do care about BLM and are not racist. I am sure they feel there voice is drowned out and do not feel encouraged to speak up at this time.

Democrats are viewed as concerned about the issue, maybe to an overriding extent, but that they are absolutely ineffective at making change. Obama having beers to resolve a minor incident while arming the police with para-military equipment.

I think huge strides were made between the 1950's and the 1970's and then things stagnated and rot set in. Teaching people to be color blind was admirable and best intentioned but it stopped there. That stoppage allowed rot to set in and that was evident in both parties. The crack down on welfare, the war on drugs and so much more. There is tons of change required and even properly implemented will take generations. Many of the issues aren't tied to race, such as social safety nets and public health care. There may be disparate impact but they are signs of an uncaring society. It's ridiculous to expect an uncaring society to care about BLM in a manner to exact change.

Thanks, surf. This is interesting to read, and I find it to be very insightful. I remain hopeful that macphisto will offer his thoughts for us.

As an aside, here is a new example of why players flexing might in this manner matters:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

doug rr wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:abolish the polish

If only.

try enjoying a life without pierogi and sauerkraut...

I don't want to live in that world doug

it's your pierogative.

Kraut of my mind

Also, excellent post, dad

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Also, excellent post, dad

here for the puns.

I honestly don't know enough about Poland for these.

Warsaw Ghettolé