Travel thread

Post Reply

Is Travel Advice worse than Foodie-ism?

Yes
4
50%
No
3
38%
If it doesnt help me get clicks, it’s not worth doing
1
13%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Travel thread

Post by Jorge »

Anyway, I'd pick 2. Aisle seat, plus I wanna chat with Moisty
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27424
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Travel thread

Post by doug rr »

Image
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27424
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Travel thread

Post by doug rr »

I didn't look at this test as just choosing what seat you like..I'm an aisle seat guy as well but I want to sit next to dick heads and mess with them..anyway, none of them are flying commercial anyway
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by spike »

Chris_H_2 wrote:speaking of the vatican, the museums and, specifically, the sistine chapel, based on all of my visits there going back to 1995, i can definitely say that it's gotten to the point where it's simply unenjoyable and frankly, a borderline skip if time is an issue. the crowds are just too overwhelming (and this is at all times of year).

in speaking with locals and museum guides, the more recent problems stem from two things: (1) travelers are still pent up from covid and are now visiting europe in bigger throngs than before, and (2) the arrival of cruise ships to ostia and them lifting the limits on them in adjacent ports (ever notice the recent influx of seagulls in rome? well, they followed the travelers from the cruise ships). the vatican's stance is that its works should be open to everyone with no restrictions (which, of course, means more money).

the easy solution for the vatican museums is to have two separate entrances. about 75%-85% of people are interested in one thing and one thing only -- the sistine chapel. so they could set up one entrance just to the chapel (and charge the same or minimally less), and another for the museum (those in the latter category could still access st. peter's from the chapel). this would free up a TON of space in the museum and let those that are interested in it be able to actually navigate places without having to be butts to nuts with every other tourist.

make it happen vatican.

pro tip: book the scavi tour in st. peter's which gets you to the original crypts and foundation, including supposedly st. peter's tomb. this will get you immediately into st. peter's without having to wait for hours in the long security line. you cannot book online or through a tour company, but can only do so by emailing the vatican's excavation office. it's a really cool experience, and very few people know about it (i suggested this to dad, but he's an idiot and failed to take my suggestion).
The real Sistine Chapel hack is pay a little more for the evening tour. It was us and like 20 other people in there. Entry to Vatican Museum after, just no St Peters cuz it’s closed by then. Whatever.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by spike »

Jorge wrote:Anyway, I'd pick 2. Aisle seat, plus I wanna chat with Moisty
Except you’re sitting across the aisle from someone who chooses to sit next to Ben Shapiro.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Travel thread

Post by bart »

How many tiny jack daniels bottles do you think Alex Jones would put away
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Travel thread

Post by bart »

Has to be 4 for me, both the other guys in the row look small, Putin is like 5’5 so he prob wouldn’t be kneeing my seat, plus 10 is in the back row so you can’t recline and you’re near the bathroom.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by spike »

Is that RDJ in row 4?
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by spike »

Someone photoshop the RMers who have already picked their seat onto the pic so the rest of us can decide based on the latest info.

Go ahead and assign Burt to seat 7.
pepperwhiteMFC
AnalLog
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by pepperwhiteMFC »

#3

10 hour raw dog
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Travel thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Carl Sandburg wrote:There is a wolf in me . . . fangs pointed for tearing gashes . . . a red tongue for raw meat . . . and the hot lapping of blood—I keep this wolf because the wilderness gave it to me and the wilderness will not let it go.

There is a fox in me . . . a silver-gray fox . . . I sniff and guess . . . I pick things out of the wind and air . . . I nose in the dark night and take sleepers and eat them and hide the feathers . . . I circle and loop and double-cross.

There is a hog in me . . . a snout and a belly . . . a machinery for eating and grunting . . . a machinery for sleeping satisfied in the sun—I got this too from the wilderness and the wilderness will not let it go.

There is a fish in me . . . I know I came from salt-blue water-gates . . . I scurried with shoals of herring . . . I blew waterspouts with porpoises . . . before land was . . . before the water went down . . . before Noah . . . before the first chapter of Genesis.

There is a baboon in me . . . clambering-clawed . . . dog-faced . . . yawping a galoot's hunger . . . hairy under the armpits . . . here are the hawk-eyed hankering men . . . here are the blonde and blue-eyed women . . . here they hide curled asleep waiting . . . ready to snarl and kill . . . ready to sing and give milk . . . waiting—I keep the baboon because the wilderness says so.

There is an eagle in me and a mockingbird . . . and the eagle flies among the Rocky Mountains of my dreams and fights among the Sierra crags of what I want . . . and the mockingbird warbles in the early forenoon before the dew is gone, warbles in the underbrush of my Chattanoogas of hope, gushes over the blue Ozark foothills of my wishes—And I got the eagle and the mockingbird from the wilderness.

O, I got a zoo, I got a menagerie, inside my ribs, under my bony head, under my red-valve heart—and I got something else: it is a man-child heart, a woman-child heart: it is a father and mother and lover: it came from God-Knows-Where: it is going to God-Knows-Where—For I am the keeper of the zoo: I say yes and no: I sing and kill and work: I am a pal of the world: I came from the wilderness.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Tue January 13, 2026 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pepperwhiteMFC
AnalLog
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by pepperwhiteMFC »

I have a high pain tolerance, trag.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15605
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Travel thread

Post by Chris_H_2 »

pepperwhiteMFC wrote:I have a high pain tolerance, trag.
Would you go on a cruise with those two?
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15605
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Travel thread

Post by Chris_H_2 »

spike wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:speaking of the vatican, the museums and, specifically, the sistine chapel, based on all of my visits there going back to 1995, i can definitely say that it's gotten to the point where it's simply unenjoyable and frankly, a borderline skip if time is an issue. the crowds are just too overwhelming (and this is at all times of year).

in speaking with locals and museum guides, the more recent problems stem from two things: (1) travelers are still pent up from covid and are now visiting europe in bigger throngs than before, and (2) the arrival of cruise ships to ostia and them lifting the limits on them in adjacent ports (ever notice the recent influx of seagulls in rome? well, they followed the travelers from the cruise ships). the vatican's stance is that its works should be open to everyone with no restrictions (which, of course, means more money).

the easy solution for the vatican museums is to have two separate entrances. about 75%-85% of people are interested in one thing and one thing only -- the sistine chapel. so they could set up one entrance just to the chapel (and charge the same or minimally less), and another for the museum (those in the latter category could still access st. peter's from the chapel). this would free up a TON of space in the museum and let those that are interested in it be able to actually navigate places without having to be butts to nuts with every other tourist.

make it happen vatican.

pro tip: book the scavi tour in st. peter's which gets you to the original crypts and foundation, including supposedly st. peter's tomb. this will get you immediately into st. peter's without having to wait for hours in the long security line. you cannot book online or through a tour company, but can only do so by emailing the vatican's excavation office. it's a really cool experience, and very few people know about it (i suggested this to dad, but he's an idiot and failed to take my suggestion).
The real Sistine Chapel hack is pay a little more for the evening tour. It was us and like 20 other people in there. Entry to Vatican Museum after, just no St Peters cuz it’s closed by then. Whatever.
Exactly how much is “a little more?”
pepperwhiteMFC
AnalLog
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by pepperwhiteMFC »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
pepperwhiteMFC wrote:I have a high pain tolerance, trag.
Would you go on a cruise with those two?

The cruise itinerary is already pushing the limit.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by spike »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:speaking of the vatican, the museums and, specifically, the sistine chapel, based on all of my visits there going back to 1995, i can definitely say that it's gotten to the point where it's simply unenjoyable and frankly, a borderline skip if time is an issue. the crowds are just too overwhelming (and this is at all times of year).

in speaking with locals and museum guides, the more recent problems stem from two things: (1) travelers are still pent up from covid and are now visiting europe in bigger throngs than before, and (2) the arrival of cruise ships to ostia and them lifting the limits on them in adjacent ports (ever notice the recent influx of seagulls in rome? well, they followed the travelers from the cruise ships). the vatican's stance is that its works should be open to everyone with no restrictions (which, of course, means more money).

the easy solution for the vatican museums is to have two separate entrances. about 75%-85% of people are interested in one thing and one thing only -- the sistine chapel. so they could set up one entrance just to the chapel (and charge the same or minimally less), and another for the museum (those in the latter category could still access st. peter's from the chapel). this would free up a TON of space in the museum and let those that are interested in it be able to actually navigate places without having to be butts to nuts with every other tourist.

make it happen vatican.

pro tip: book the scavi tour in st. peter's which gets you to the original crypts and foundation, including supposedly st. peter's tomb. this will get you immediately into st. peter's without having to wait for hours in the long security line. you cannot book online or through a tour company, but can only do so by emailing the vatican's excavation office. it's a really cool experience, and very few people know about it (i suggested this to dad, but he's an idiot and failed to take my suggestion).
The real Sistine Chapel hack is pay a little more for the evening tour. It was us and like 20 other people in there. Entry to Vatican Museum after, just no St Peters cuz it’s closed by then. Whatever.
Exactly how much is “a little more?”
It was like 20 Euro a person in 2016.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Travel thread

Post by Strat »

Went to vatican city once. Left almost immediately. Zero desire to see that place or spend my precious time in one of my favorite countries at such a dump
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15605
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Travel thread

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Strat wrote:Went to vatican city once. Left almost immediately. Zero desire to see that place or spend my precious time in one of my favorite countries at such a dump
i mean, if your definition of "dump" is based exclusively on the sheer overwhelming numbers of tourists at any given time, then i would agree with you. otherwise, there are probably better descriptors to use than "dump."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29887
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by 96583UP »

there is a lot of expensive decorations which jesus likes and egyptian artifacts which also jesus likes and creepy paintings about bad stuff which apparently jesus needs lots of. also child molestation and nazi gold.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29887
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Travel thread

Post by 96583UP »

fr tho it is unique and wonderful and terrible all at the same time

a showcase of brilliant art and good spiritual intentions and intellect, on paper

sullied in practice by apes in fancy robes doing stupid ape things
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply