Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 9:32 pm
WHY CAN'T EVERY STATE VOTE AT THE SAME TIME?!?!?!? THAT WAY RESULTS WOULDN'T INFLUENCE HOW VOTERS VOTE IN OTHER PRIMARIES!!!! IT'S SO STOOOOPED!!!
Because staggering them allows for regionally focused campaigning.Chris_H_2 wrote:WHY CAN'T EVERY STATE VOTE AT THE SAME TIME?!?!?!? THAT WAY RESULTS WOULDN'T INFLUENCE HOW VOTERS VOTE IN OTHER PRIMARIES!!!! IT'S SO STOOOOPED!!!
As an outsider, the whole process seems bizarre.Monkey_Driven wrote:The primary system is kind of dumb.
They make the whole process confusing and opaque so that people will hopefully not notice they are being screwed.Birds in Hell wrote:As an outsider, the whole process seems bizarre.Monkey_Driven wrote:The primary system is kind of dumb.
I can see something like this being a good system.turned2black wrote:I like the idea of a more compact primary season with regions that would rotate on who would hold their primaries first. (It would be kinda cool to see a state like California actually matter).
Then popular vote in the general.
cutuphalfdead wrote:I can see something like this being a good system.turned2black wrote:I like the idea of a more compact primary season with regions that would rotate on who would hold their primaries first. (It would be kinda cool to see a state like California actually matter).
Then popular vote in the general.
The problem is the states can hold their primaries whenever they want, and you have a state like New Hampshire that has a state law which says they must hold their primary first. So if another state tries to hold their primary earlier than New Hampshire traditionally does, the Secretary of State of New Hampshire is obligated by law to move their primary up to still be first. It got a little contentious in 2012, which is why New Hampshire voted in early January instead of February in that cycle.stip wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I can see something like this being a good system.turned2black wrote:I like the idea of a more compact primary season with regions that would rotate on who would hold their primaries first. (It would be kinda cool to see a state like California actually matter).
Then popular vote in the general.
That, or ensuring that no one region dominates a grouping, but that makes campaigning more difficult
Classic b!BurtReynolds wrote:unmute it
https://vine.co/v/igH3wW1Khe9
I will commit suicide over this disgrace.Simple Torture wrote:Classic b!BurtReynolds wrote:unmute it
https://vine.co/v/igH3wW1Khe9
That sounds reasonable.BurtReynolds wrote:I will commit suicide over this disgrace.Simple Torture wrote:Classic b!BurtReynolds wrote:unmute it
https://vine.co/v/igH3wW1Khe9
Classic geg!BurtReynolds wrote:I will commit suicide over this disgrace.Simple Torture wrote:Classic b!BurtReynolds wrote:unmute it
https://vine.co/v/igH3wW1Khe9
Simple Torture wrote:That sounds reasonable.BurtReynolds wrote:I will commit suicide over this disgrace.Simple Torture wrote:Classic b!BurtReynolds wrote:unmute it
https://vine.co/v/igH3wW1Khe9
