Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:if it gets us closer to playing 162, Im on board (4 game series! 2 home, 2 away!Whole Rotation!)

By 2018 we're just gonna have every franchise and play along with the actual MLB schedule.

We have 2 weeks to figure out how to make this happen in time for this year.

OUT

We should research the pay option. If it means better bullpen, pinch hitter control, I'd chip in. Stats would probably keep themselves too.

The amount of at bats my bullpen had really pissed me off.

I'm trying a trial league - 10 games. $80 million salary cap was tough. All these settings - my head is spinning.

Wow. The level of detail is sick. Pinch hitter hierarchies - vs L, vs. R - need power, need contact. Defensive hierarchies. Rest hierarchies. Baserunning aggressiveness. Pinch counts, Grady Little stats. $13

$13 is worth it for stat tracking alone.

cutuphalfdead wrote:We looked into it before and there were a bunch of downsides I scarcely remember.

cutuphalfdead wrote:We looked into it before and there were a bunch of downsides I scarcely remember.

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

If you want 162, wouldn't the formal league make the most sense.

@SkitchP wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

If you want 162, wouldn't the formal league make the most sense.

Nothing about any of this makes any sense. Why start now?

@SkitchP wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

If you want 162, wouldn't the formal league make the most sense.

Nothing about any of this makes any sense. Why start now?

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

If you want 162, wouldn't the formal league make the most sense.

Nothing about any of this makes any sense. Why start now?

You posted about it last page.

@SkitchP wrote:I like that spike and ct are basically low key wiersing our tournament.

numbers wrote:You aren't shit in this game until you've won something with chud's help.

The Argonaut wrote:What are the candidates for next tournament?
Pre-1947?
Franchise Tournament v.3 (post-2016)?

Lament wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:What are the candidates for next tournament?
Pre-1947?
Franchise Tournament v.3 (post-2016)?

Franchise 3 will be in October at the earliest. Live Ball Era (1920-1946) would be the next Era one chronologically, but if the interest in that is low, we can try to go a different direction in the next one. A few random ideas...

Decades: Each participant gets a different decade and can build his team from any season from said decade.

Dynasty: Each participant takes a different chunk of a franchise (say, ten years, though we could change that), and builds a team from that period. There'd be the potential for multiple representatives from each franchise (as long as there was no overlap, for example you could have a 1909-1918 Red Sox team as well as a 1999-2008 Red Sox team).

Era All-Stars: This would probably be better if we did it after doing the Live Ball (and possibly Dead Ball) tournament, but each participant would make a team comprised of any player who appeared on one of their previous Era teams.

Any other ideas?

Lament wrote: Decades: Each participant gets a different decade and can build his team from any season from said decade.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Lament wrote: Decades: Each participant gets a different decade and can build his team from any season from said decade.

I could see this causing problems. There are only a few of us on the board that understand that a decade is year 1 through 0, not 0 through 9.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Lament wrote: Decades: Each participant gets a different decade and can build his team from any season from said decade.

I could see this causing problems. There are only a few of us on the board that understand that a decade is year 1 through 0, not 0 through 9.