Red Mosquito

i guess you could say America is increasingly becoming:

Spoiler: show

A plan for smart investment in mid-tier metros? What an oppressor!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.co ... 1578484804

Bi_3 wrote:A plan for smart investment in mid-tier metros? What an oppressor!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.co ... 1578484804

what an asshole!

'we don't need your bi-coastal elite charity' - someone who isn't real

Honest to god I understand the Bloomberg morons more than I understand anyone pulling for Amy Klobuchar.

Numbers and bil3 are the only Bloomberg Bitches. You understand a total of two people. On Earth.

SunKing wrote:Honest to god I understand the Bloomberg morons more than I understand anyone pulling for Amy Klobuchar.

Which of his policies do you most disagree with?

verb_to_trust wrote:Numbers and bil3 are the only Bloomberg Bitches. You understand a total of two people. On Earth.

big fan here since 2003

Bi_3 wrote:

SunKing wrote:Honest to god I understand the Bloomberg morons more than I understand anyone pulling for Amy Klobuchar.

Which of his policies do you most disagree with?

Bi_3 wrote:

SunKing wrote:Honest to god I understand the Bloomberg morons more than I understand anyone pulling for Amy Klobuchar.

Which of his policies do you most disagree with?

Long list, but I was speaking more in terms of electability. I find it hard to believe that the aging billionaire from NYC is going to match up well against Trump given the tenor of the country right now. But my point was that I find it EVEN HARDER to believe that anyone would get excited about Amy Klobuchar.

doug rr wrote:

This pic really makes me laugh

5-6% of the country is walking around thinking that Elizabeth Warren's real problem is that she's just too damn charismatic. It blows my mind. I understand the appeal of Marianne and Tom Steyer more than Klobuchar.

SunKing wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

SunKing wrote:Honest to god I understand the Bloomberg morons more than I understand anyone pulling for Amy Klobuchar.

Which of his policies do you most disagree with?

Long list, but I was speaking more in terms of electability. I find it hard to believe that the aging billionaire from NYC is going to match up well against Trump given the tenor of the country right now. But my point was that I find it EVEN HARDER to believe that anyone would get excited about Amy Klobuchar.

I agree about AmKo. I generally agree with her positions but she is off putting (latent sexism?).

I don’t have good insight in what the left is thinking WRT to non-Bernie candidates. Would they come out for Biden or throw a hissy fit like in 2016? Or is dethroning Trump enough to flip back Trumps swing states? I feel like Bloomberg could land the Obama voters that went for Trump, the reasonable moderates of the Midwest, and with the right VP (Harris), could get some of the intersections-uber-alles lefties. Where I’m at is that beating Trump in November is the most important thing, not single payer healthcare, not college debt forgiveness, just undo the last four years.

You win by mobilizing people who didn't vote in 16, not by trying to woo on the fence Trump voters with some fucking billionaire. That demographic *doesn't exist*

guys WSJ already solved this - 2.3% of Trump voters died since the last election bc they were old af and now they have been replaced by young idealist transvestite anchor babies. it’s all locked up for the Blue team now unless Ralph Nader decides he wants to put Trump back in the White House

verb_to_trust wrote:You win by mobilizing people who didn't vote in 16, not by trying to woo on the fence Trump voters with some fucking billionaire. That demographic *doesn't exist*

So, that’s not correct. You need to grow the count of voters on your side (or shrink them on the other side) in a few non-coastal states and you dont do that by offering positions extolled by extremely online leftists. Focusing on wooing the adolescent 30-somethings who were unwilling to show up to stop Trump the first time and elect the first woman president is a lost cause.

Bi_3 wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:You win by mobilizing people who didn't vote in 16, not by trying to woo on the fence Trump voters with some fucking billionaire. That demographic *doesn't exist*

So, that’s not correct. You need to grow the count of voters on your side (or shrink them on the other side) in a few non-coastal states and you dont do that by offering positions extolled by extremely online leftists. Focusing on wooing the adolescent 30-somethings who were unwilling to show up to stop Trump the first time and elect the first woman president is a lost cause.

Lots of people just didn't vote. Lots more than people than the 5 Obama voters who voted for trump, you and numbers up. Do math.

Well have to agree to disagree a gigaton on that.


Meanwhile, as the blue states commit suicide via democratic socialism, historically red states are gaining seats:

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/477 ... s-momentum

I wonder if the infiltration of blue refugees into red states is part of what is causing the increase in political divide in the country...

Hard for the blue states to commit suicide when they have literally all the money.