Red Mosquito

I could agree that is a sort of art form, but its one thats is dead. Fuck critics then.

Relax

im chill as an ice in a good coke my friend.

Is ice colder in a good coke than in a bad coke? What is it about the quality of the coke that affects the temperature of the ice?

BurtReynolds wrote:I disagree that good critics approach art criticism as artists. It's a craft. The few that are good you will never hear about because they don't pretend they are artists. Most critics are useless because they think they are artists.


Or worse, they are moralizing ideologues masquerading as art critics and using art from actual creative people to push their bullshit. That's most reviewers these days.

There's more moralizing ideology in this post than most reviews.

durdencommatyler wrote:Is ice colder in a good coke than in a bad coke? What is it about the quality of the coke that affects the temperature of the ice?

Ice in a coke is in the process of melting

Like VinylGuy right now!!!

durdencommatyler wrote:Is ice colder in a good coke than in a bad coke? What is it about the quality of the coke that affects the temperature of the ice?

If its an old coke, the ice wont be chill as fuck. Thats common knowledge joe.

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:Is ice colder in a good coke than in a bad coke? What is it about the quality of the coke that affects the temperature of the ice?

If its an old coke, the ice wont be chill as fuck. Thats common knowledge joe.

I don't understand. Do you have to put old ice in an old coke in Argentina?

theplatypus wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:Is ice colder in a good coke than in a bad coke? What is it about the quality of the coke that affects the temperature of the ice?

Ice in a coke is in the process of melting

Like VinylGuy right now!!!

I f you have an old coke in your fridge the ice wont be as chill as one in a recently opened coke.

Damn joe.

VinylGuy wrote:I f you have an old coke in your fridge the ice wont be as chill as one in a recently opened coke.

Damn joe.

This entire line of posts is fucking retarded.

Of course art should be critiqued, that's what humans fucking do.

This thread is about ice now

durdencommatyler wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:I f you have an old coke in your fridge the ice wont be as chill as one in a recently opened coke.

Damn joe.

would you please see my post of the cinematic news? its for you and it will be life changing.

theplatypus wrote:This thread is about ice now

AND COKE

theplatypus wrote:This thread is about ice now

AL

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:I disagree that good critics approach art criticism as artists. It's a craft. The few that are good you will never hear about because they don't pretend they are artists. Most critics are useless because they think they are artists.


Or worse, they are moralizing ideologues masquerading as art critics and using art from actual creative people to push their bullshit. That's most reviewers these days.

I didn’t say they consciously approach it as art; I said they’re artists. It just flows from them naturally as art. Good criticism doesn’t just mean explaining whether you like or dislike something - it means writing good prose, it means having a point of view and being able to express it meaningfully. That’s an art.

I agree then. I think art critics can be artistic or creative writers, but it seems to me that art criticism itself (in the newspaper/Rotten Tomatoes variety I mean) is not an art form, and good prose or creative writing can actually detract. But that's probably a narrow idea of what an art critic is. Essentially I think those art critics' job is to tell readers whether or not they should see something.


But what is art anyway oh my god i want to kill myself

That's an unbelievably narrow view of criticism.

run2death wrote:That's an unbelievably narrow view of criticism.

I like it though.

Art and how humans consume and process it is such an important part of life to most people, to reduce it to a "should you go and see it" level is insane to me.