Red Mosquito

I guess President Trump isn’t the homophobic racist that you Dems want us to believe he is. Time to find something else to hate him for.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019 ... nLFzTM88MY

Apparently abuse of power isn't even a crime, so Trump is in the clear.

This isn't troubling at all.

Antisemitism in any for shouldn’t be embraced. Good Trump.

oh honey...

had not thought about it this way tbh.

bune wrote:

had not thought about it this way tbh.

And that's just one major problem with it. This shit is nefarious, dangerous, and sickening.

durdencommatyler wrote:

bune wrote:

had not thought about it this way tbh.

And that's just one major problem with it. This shit is nefarious, dangerous, and sickening.

I feel you could be wrong in your interpretation of the executive order.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... daism.html

"The New York Times published a bombshell report on Tuesday claiming that President Donald Trump planned to sign an executive order that interpreted Judaism “as a race or nationality” under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI governs federally funded educational programs, so the Times warned that the order might be deployed to quelch anti-Israel speech on campus. “Mr. Trump’s order,” the Times further claimed, “will have the effect of embracing an argument that Jews are a people or a race with a collective national origin in the Middle East, like Italian Americans or Polish Americans.”

That turned out to be untrue. The text of the order, which leaked on Wednesday, does not redefine Judaism is a race or nationality. It does not claim that Jews are a nation or a different race. The order’s interpretation of Title VI—insofar as the law applies to Jews—is entirely in line with the Obama administration’s approach. It only deviates from past practice by suggesting that harsh criticism of Israel—specifically, the notion that it is “a racist endeavor”—may be used as evidence to prove anti-Semitic intent. There is good reason, however, to doubt that the order can actually be used to suppress non-bigoted disapproval of Israel on college campuses."

that burn though...

I have no idea what's going on.

bune wrote:

had not thought about it this way tbh.

i thought this was supposed to be really explicitly clear? why did it end with a question

durdencommatyler wrote:oh honey...

i believe the correct phrase you are looking for is, bless his heart

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Step one: introduce articles of impeachment

Step two: immediately thereafter, give the president a huge win on a topic that moves polls

Step three: his popularity ticks upwards temporarily, thanks to the trade deal

Step four: you panic and think that impeachment has backfired

Step five: moderate Democrats then vote against impeachment, lending crucial credibility to Republican spin

I love when a plan comes together

god forbid they vote based on evidence and arguments

The Democrats are doing a much better job with their speeches than these dumb-dumbs like Miss Piggy and Cletus.

This Republican talking point that impeaching Trump is about “undoing the 2016” election is ridiculous. It’s not like Hillary Clinton gets sworn in if Trump is thrown out. Republicans still control the executive branch. I guess dumb people eat it up though.

This would be such a remarkable gift to Democrats. 47% of voters support impeachment, but 59% believe that Trump’s actions were inappropriate. After all this work trying to muddy the waters with conspiracy nonsense, they’d be hitting full reset on 2018’s “Republicans won’t hold Trump accountable” message, which killed them.

It’s such a total gift to Democrats that I almost can’t believe they would do it.

I think you’re overestimating people’s interest in the difference between “dismiss” and “acquit,” McP.

americans forget everything so quickly

if they do this now there is still a whole year for people to move on and with the help of a few rubles focus on new at-home email server scandals