Red Mosquito

elliseamos wrote:No, they have problems, too.

I think I can think of one, come to think of it...

Nothing but shit talk?

Bammer wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:

Bammer wrote:Hey man, if you’re gay, bi, whatever, cool with me.

Grammatically incorrect pronouns? Out.

Don't pretend it's about protecting grammar. That's so weak (and makes even less sense). If you want to post about being mean, embrace it

Oh it’s the grammar. That and the inconsistency. Here’s an oldie but a goodie:

Bammer wrote:I am so confused...

“Clarendon — an eight-year veteran in the WNBA — announced they were trans in 2020. In an Instagram post, Clarendon wrote he was trans and non-binary, meaning she does not identify with the gender assigned to her at birth, but does not consider himself exclusively male or female. Clarendon uses the pronouns she/her/they/them/he/him.”

This is so boring, Bammer! There is so much more better SJW shenanigans to put in this thread. This sort of thing shouldn't even qualify. Don't waste your time with this (actually-easy-to-understand (wait, is Bammer dumb?)) pronoun stuff.

The Argonaut wrote:

Bammer wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:

Bammer wrote:Hey man, if you’re gay, bi, whatever, cool with me.

Grammatically incorrect pronouns? Out.

Don't pretend it's about protecting grammar. That's so weak (and makes even less sense). If you want to post about being mean, embrace it

Oh it’s the grammar. That and the inconsistency. Here’s an oldie but a goodie:

Bammer wrote:I am so confused...

“Clarendon — an eight-year veteran in the WNBA — announced they were trans in 2020. In an Instagram post, Clarendon wrote he was trans and non-binary, meaning she does not identify with the gender assigned to her at birth, but does not consider himself exclusively male or female. Clarendon uses the pronouns she/her/they/them/he/him.”

This is so boring, Bammer! There is so much more better SJW shenanigans to put in this thread. This sort of thing shouldn't even qualify. Don't waste your time with this (actually-easy-to-understand (wait, is Bammer dumb?)) pronoun stuff.

Yeah yeah ok. You glossed over the two-faced use of the pregnant woman for woke points.

One thing that definitely defines the Bammer account is impeccable grammar.

He/they or she/they is annoying if the person actually does have a preference but doesn't want to reveal it. Don't make me guess!

tragabigzanda wrote:I give myself a pat on the back every time I say “hey man” to the trans dudes at my co-op

'Hey man' is my go to regardless of gender

“Hey guys”

Bammer wrote:Today's Seattle Times headline about the cops being found not guilty of murdering Charleena Lyles went out of its way to note in the headline that they are not guilty of murdering pregnant woman Charleena Lyles (at age 30, already had 4 other kids). My first thought is to put together a venn diagram of the people who use her pregnancy as an extra shot at villifying the cops compared to the people who marched through our local 4th of July parade shouting "My body, my choice" in response to the Supreme Court. It would be one circle. That's not necessarily a knock on pro-choice, I'm just saying it's a bit two faced. Do you value the life of an unborn baby or not? Pick one.

I'm not sure why people let this post slide. Maybe because it's incomprehensibly dumb?

Bammer, thinks that is hypocritical to be pro choice, and against murdering pregnant women?

I actually can't even feel mad because I'm so confused. If the right-wing people are this dumb there is really no point debating them. You pretty much have to pity them. And I do think Bammer has epitomized their ignorance with his post. If these people take over the world it's over. This is the real threat to democracy. We have to be willing to do whatever it takes to defeat the growing threat of facism and populism. Remember, that they don't play by any rules and it's helping them gain power.

...

Bammer wrote:Hey man, if you’re gay, bi, whatever, cool with me.

Appreciate it.

The Argonaut wrote:Why are you troubled by this? It's like the least troubling thing in the universe. Think about other things

There is a clear distinction between being basically decent and respecting an individuals preferred pronouns and social enforcement of language corruption.

Does 2 x 2 = 5 or does 2 x 2 = 4?

Dev wrote:

Bammer wrote:Today's Seattle Times headline about the cops being found not guilty of murdering Charleena Lyles went out of its way to note in the headline that they are not guilty of murdering pregnant woman Charleena Lyles (at age 30, already had 4 other kids). My first thought is to put together a venn diagram of the people who use her pregnancy as an extra shot at villifying the cops compared to the people who marched through our local 4th of July parade shouting "My body, my choice" in response to the Supreme Court. It would be one circle. That's not necessarily a knock on pro-choice, I'm just saying it's a bit two faced. Do you value the life of an unborn baby or not? Pick one.

I'm not sure why people let this post slide. Maybe because it's incomprehensibly dumb?

Bammer, thinks that is hypocritical to be pro choice, and against murdering pregnant women?

I actually can't even feel mad because I'm so confused. If the right-wing people are this dumb there is really no point debating them. You pretty much have to pity them. And I do think Bammer has epitomized their ignorance with his post. If these people take over the world it's over. This is the real threat to democracy. We have to be willing to do whatever it takes to defeat the growing threat of facism and populism. Remember, that they don't play by any rules and it's helping them gain power.

Bammer's post is the type of post that reminds me that humanity is ultimately doomed.

Bi_3 wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:Why are you troubled by this? It's like the least troubling thing in the universe. Think about other things

There is a clear distinction between being basically decent and respecting an individuals preferred pronouns and social enforcement of language corruption.

Does 2 x 2 = 5 or does 2 x 2 = 4?

i kinda get the feeling that Bammer believes the universe revolves around him/his/they

Mickey wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:Why are you troubled by this? It's like the least troubling thing in the universe. Think about other things

There is a clear distinction between being basically decent and respecting an individuals preferred pronouns and social enforcement of language corruption.

Does 2 x 2 = 5 or does 2 x 2 = 4?

Tell me why that is wrong. Tell me how this doesn't lead to a Tower of Babel effect where innocent, well-meaning, and decent people can no longer understand each other. Tell me why those people won't resort to censoring their words and ultimately their thoughts for fear of crossing some high subjective, coded language taboo and hurting others. I am a Morlock so use small words.

When someone asks you to use they/them you try to do it. If you mess up you say, hey, sorry. Next question.

Bi_3 wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

The Argonaut wrote:Why are you troubled by this? It's like the least troubling thing in the universe. Think about other things

There is a clear distinction between being basically decent and respecting an individuals preferred pronouns and social enforcement of language corruption.

Does 2 x 2 = 5 or does 2 x 2 = 4?

Tell me why that is wrong. Tell me how this doesn't lead to a Tower of Babel effect where innocent, well-meaning, and decent people can no longer understand each other. Tell me why those people won't resort to censoring their words and ultimately their thoughts for fear of crossing some high subjective, coded language taboo and hurting others. I am a Morlock so use small words.

Does language not evolve? Do your Negro friends have an opinion about it? Did math collapse into a blackhole when the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians took to the field this year?

.

Dev wrote:

Bammer wrote:Today's Seattle Times headline about the cops being found not guilty of murdering Charleena Lyles went out of its way to note in the headline that they are not guilty of murdering pregnant woman Charleena Lyles (at age 30, already had 4 other kids). My first thought is to put together a venn diagram of the people who use her pregnancy as an extra shot at villifying the cops compared to the people who marched through our local 4th of July parade shouting "My body, my choice" in response to the Supreme Court. It would be one circle. That's not necessarily a knock on pro-choice, I'm just saying it's a bit two faced. Do you value the life of an unborn baby or not? Pick one.

I'm not sure why people let this post slide. Maybe because it's incomprehensibly dumb?

Bammer, thinks that is hypocritical to be pro choice, and against murdering pregnant women?

I actually can't even feel mad because I'm so confused. If the right-wing people are this dumb there is really no point debating them. You pretty much have to pity them. And I do think Bammer has epitomized their ignorance with his post. If these people take over the world it's over. This is the real threat to democracy. We have to be willing to do whatever it takes to defeat the growing threat of facism and populism. Remember, that they don't play by any rules and it's helping them gain power.

Is this News & Debate? Or is it News & Posts That You Know Everyone Will Just Agree With, Nod Their Head, And Move Along?

Also ... not right wing my man.