Page 2 of 3
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 10:08 pm
by Birds in Hell
I listened too and came to the same conclusion: Trampled, easy.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 10:09 pm
by epilogue
Birds in Hell wrote:I listened too and came to the same conclusion: Trampled, easy.

Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:38 am
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:I actually listened to both of these before I voted. Which is the first time I've done this during this tournament.
Trampled Under Foot, and it's not even close.

Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:43 am
by tragabigzanda
Why is chud defending a rote blues-rock track over the pseudo-sexual powerhouse that is Trampled Under Foot?
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:45 am
by Norah
Because it's better.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:46 am
by tragabigzanda
Your priorities are fucking weird.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:52 am
by epilogue
Sometimes these differences are funny or playful to me. But I genuinely don't understand this one. Just fucking LISTEN to the songs. Trampled is so much better it's not even funny. I mean, just... JUST LISTEN TO IT.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:54 am
by Norah
I have. It's a good song, it's just not top tier Zeppelin like HMMT is.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:54 am
by tragabigzanda
durdencommatyler wrote:Sometimes these differences are funny or playful to me. But I genuinely don't understand this one. Just fucking LISTEN to the songs. Trampled is so much better it's not even funny. I mean, just... JUST LISTEN TO IT.
Right? That other song sounds like a Cream deep cut.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:54 am
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:I have. It's a good song, it's just not top tier Zeppelin like HMMT is.
JUST LISTEN TO IT PETER
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:56 am
by tragabigzanda
Pete, have you tried listening stoned? I'm being serious. Smoke a j and crank your preferred listening device.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:58 am
by Norah
If you need to be stoned for it to click it's not that good to begin with.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:01 am
by tragabigzanda
Stop it, are you really suggesting that marijuana hasn't opened you up to various works of art before?
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:03 am
by Norah
Not to the point where I needed the marijuana for it to click. Marijuana enhances what is already there, it doesn't create anything new.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:05 am
by tragabigzanda
So then let it enhance this track for you.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:06 am
by Norah
But it'll enhance HMMT more, since it's stronger to begin with.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:08 am
by tragabigzanda
Just try and report back.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:10 am
by Norah
Fine, I'm about to pack a bowl anyway. I'll take a few hits to get going, and then play both songs back to back.
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:22 am
by Norah
yeah this isn't even close
Re: 62. Trampled Under Foot vs. How Many More Times
Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 1:24 am
by wease
cutuphalfdead wrote:yeah this isn't even close
TU for the win!