Re: Spider-Man 2 (Homecoming Sequel) 2019
Posted: Tue May 22, 2018 6:15 pm
durdencommatyler wrote:What's ASMR?
durdencommatyler wrote:What's ASMR?
Came in to post this.. they better not do away with the fishbowl so they could show more of Jake gs beautiful face.. I will be so pisseddurdencommatyler wrote:God, I hope so. Or at least something similar. They did an outstanding job with Vultures design, I think. If it's the same people on that side of things, should be pretty cool, whatever the come up with.Peeps wrote:there has to be the fishbowl...right?
I don't think they'll do it for that reason. Jake isn't that kind of actor.i got bugs wrote:Came in to post this.. they better not do away with the fishbowl so they could show more of Jake gs beautiful face.. I will be so pisseddurdencommatyler wrote:God, I hope so. Or at least something similar. They did an outstanding job with Vultures design, I think. If it's the same people on that side of things, should be pretty cool, whatever the come up with.Peeps wrote:there has to be the fishbowl...right?
Yep. Or it'll be opaque for one or two key scenes as serves the plot AND fan service.doone wrote:Fishbowl might just be less opaque so we can see Jake's beautiful face.
Vulture's was also ridiculous. I hope they do the exact same kind of thing with Mysterio's as they did with Vulture's.theplatypus wrote:Mysterio's comic costume is ridiculous. I hope they don't use it.
Right. They took the iconic elements and adapted them. It was fantastic work, I thought.theplatypus wrote:But they didn't use the Vulture's comic costume, so that's good.
I sort of see where you're coming from.. like adapt it to fit in but don't do anything drastic.. they do that to all of the movie version characters..theplatypus wrote:Mysterio's comic costume is ridiculous. I hope they don't use it.
i would literally have him go into a pet store and show him in his costume as he is looking at fishbowlsdurdencommatyler wrote:Yep. Or it'll be opaque for one or two key scenes as serves the plot AND fan service.doone wrote:Fishbowl might just be less opaque so we can see Jake's beautiful face.
Sounds like we have "go picture."Peeps wrote:i would literally have him go into a pet store and show him in his costume as he is looking at fishbowlsdurdencommatyler wrote:Yep. Or it'll be opaque for one or two key scenes as serves the plot AND fan service.doone wrote:Fishbowl might just be less opaque so we can see Jake's beautiful face.
If Tom Holland never wears the mask, why should Jake Gyllenhaal? That face is a money maker!Monkey_Driven wrote:Will they add the dome via CGI?
I just want the dome damnit.B wrote:If Tom Holland never wears the mask, why should Jake Gyllenhaal? That face is a money maker!Monkey_Driven wrote:Will they add the dome via CGI?
Once upon a time they called these places "discussion boards."theplatypus wrote:It is not a big deal but I prefer to do ny own research when I don't know what someone is referring to online
I've been trying to figure out what is bothering me about this and I think it's the shadows. They're going down towards the bottom of the picture but you can see on their legs that they are lit from the right as well by something but it's not causing shadows at all. It's like a bad render from a game that doesn't have a very good light engine.B wrote: