Page 2 of 2
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:07 pm
by Jorge
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:25 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
theplatypus wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:27 pm
by epilogue
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:theplatypus wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
PEW PEW... you know... for kids!
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:32 pm
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:33 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:theplatypus wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
PEW PEW... you know... for kids!
lol
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:44 pm
by epilogue
VinylGuy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
Just what LV reiterated. Theatrical release doesn't matter.
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 11:47 pm
by tree_
It only mattered before home theaters were prevalent
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 12:16 am
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
Just what LV reiterated. Theatrical release doesn't matter.
Buy why they dont matter? All you guys are saying is that.
Care to explain?
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 12:16 am
by LoathedVermin72
Why DO they matter? As long as people can watch it, what’s the difference?
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 12:19 am
by VinylGuy
ey i ask first
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 1:34 am
by epilogue
VinylGuy wrote:ey i ask first
So then you think art only counts if it's mass produced and mass consumed in public in a large format at a cost?
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 3:29 am
by Mickey
I read every iteration of SW in this thread as "sex worker" just fyi
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 6:00 am
by BurtReynolds
In the future, all art will just be different iterations of Star Wars.
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 6:04 am
by LoathedVermin72
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 6:34 am
by Bammer
Mickey wrote:I read every iteration of SW in this thread as "sex worker" just fyi
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 11:51 pm
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:ey i ask first
So then you think art only counts if it's mass produced and mass consumed in public in a large format at a cost?
Not at all! It seems we are heading that way though.
Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 6:18 pm
by Mickey
Some of you have never read the Adorno and Horkheimer essay on "The Culture Industry" and it shows.
