Page 2 of 3
Re: English royalism
Posted: Fri December 06, 2019 3:16 am
by 96583UP
Let's all laugh at Rangers wrote:I think I've finally cracked English royalism. If you cast your mind back a few centuries when everyone was religious, the thing to understand is that royalism isn't a belief in absolute power over England (and it was England back then) as the highest power. Royalism was a belief in God having absolute power to rule over the English people, with his rule carried out through his representative on Earth, the monarch. If a pretender to the throne could convince the population that the Monarch was failing in this duty, then they could persuade the population to back them into supporting their overthrow of the Monarch. And so nothing could get in the way of God's rule. Not some hypothetical European union, nothing. If someone had to lie to the Monarch to ensure God's undiluted rule was carried out, they would. If they could convince the population of this, then they would support his or her lying to the Monarch to ensure that God's undiluted rule over the population could be carried out.
but their king only created their religion because he was a horny perv
Re: English royalism
Posted: Fri December 06, 2019 9:21 am
by Birds in Hell
wease wrote:God save the queen
Re: English royalism
Posted: Fri December 06, 2019 3:28 pm
by Green Habit
Jammer XCI wrote:“You have selected regicide. If you know the name of the king or queen being murdered, press 1”
This discussion went way too long without this quote, and even worse, it got bottom paged.
Re: English royalism
Posted: Wed January 08, 2020 11:30 pm
by Birds in Hell
Poor Harry.
I suspect this is right:
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 12:05 am
by washing machine
We can still get Meghan the throne...somehow. We can do it for the Queen.
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 12:51 am
by Green Habit
I forgot that this thread existed. Still curious as to how big of a deal this is.
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 12:56 am
by doug rr
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 12:57 am
by epilogue
HA!
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 1:04 am
by McParadigm
Birds in Hell wrote:Poor Harry.
I suspect this is right:
Thus achieving every woman’s secret fantasy of investing years of her life in deceiving a man into marriage, ruining his life, and then getting the hell out.
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 1:04 am
by McParadigm
What a stupid thing to care about
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 2:04 am
by Jorge
Birds in Hell wrote:Poor Harry.
I suspect this is right:
Why
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 2:10 am
by Simple Torture
Who hurt you spenno
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 2:26 am
by 96583UP
Good for them. The British tabloids are horrible, living in London even in a Palace would suck, and Canada - especially Vancouver - is a waaaaay better place to live, even if downgrading from Royal Family Wealth to just Upper Middle Class. They will be so much better off. Plus if they ever need to raise cash they can just release an album on iTunes.
I wonder if certain Brit tabloid people will try to move to Canada to be closer to them? I don't picture the Canadians / Canadian government tolerating that shit. They mind their own business up there.
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 10:43 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 10:45 pm
by 96583UP
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 10:57 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 11:02 pm
by 96583UP
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 11:02 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: English royalism
Posted: Thu January 09, 2020 11:03 pm
by 96583UP
Re: English royalism
Posted: Fri January 10, 2020 4:12 am
by BurtReynolds