Page 2 of 10
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:12 am
by 96583UP
liebzz wrote:96583UP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Whipping is for sure
i am starting to feel like Grover in ‘There’s a Monster at the End of this Book’
This is the Pearl Jam fan base in 2020, relating their discomfort in a Pearl Jam discussion to the stories we read our kids. I’m right there with you.
i never thought the first 4 albums could be subject to this
it’s like how Einstein must have felt when they used the A-bomb to kill people
it wasn’t meant to be used that way
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:13 am
by Jorge
Homeboyd wrote:96583UP wrote:let’s set some ground rules here
nothing from Ten, Vs., Vitalogy, or No Code can be considered a ‘Spritzy Punker’
when i coined this concept it was specifically directed as an insult to aging pearl jam trying to act young and sounding terrible
Yield was the first album in which the band can first be considered ‘old’
and good luck nominating any of those songs from Yield <makes sheeshy exhaling sound>
let’s stick to when Ed’s hairline started receding
It's Platys post so he gets to make the rules...and he didn't make any rules so away we go
I'm happy to just start a conversation
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:13 am
by liebzz
96583UP wrote:liebzz wrote:96583UP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Whipping is for sure
i am starting to feel like Grover in ‘There’s a Monster at the End of this Book’
This is the Pearl Jam fan base in 2020, relating their discomfort in a Pearl Jam discussion to the stories we read our kids. I’m right there with you.
i never thought the first 4 albums could be subject to this
it’s like how Einstein must have felt when they used the A-bomb to kill people
it wasn’t meant to be used that way
Is Dirty Frank the OG spritzer?
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:13 am
by 96583UP
liebzz wrote:96583UP wrote:liebzz wrote:96583UP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Whipping is for sure
i am starting to feel like Grover in ‘There’s a Monster at the End of this Book’
This is the Pearl Jam fan base in 2020, relating their discomfort in a Pearl Jam discussion to the stories we read our kids. I’m right there with you.
i never thought the first 4 albums could be subject to this
it’s like how Einstein must have felt when they used the A-bomb to kill people
it wasn’t meant to be used that way
Is Dirty Frank the OG spritzer?
no that was a funk song
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:14 am
by Strat
Id consider numbersup a spritzy poster
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:15 am
by Jorge
When I invented the term "spritzy punker", I was imagining upbeat, "happy" sounding tracks like "Supersonic" and "Big Wave", but I'm happy to let you all build on what I started
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:16 am
by Strat
Eh. im over it.
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:16 am
by 96583UP
i definitely used the term ‘spritzy punk’ first
but i agree that the ‘punker’ adaptation was not mine
and thus
i yield nagasaki’s fate to the hoardes
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:17 am
by Jorge
No I used spritzy first
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:18 am
by 96583UP
theplatypus wrote:No I used spritzy first
oh shit it’s on <preparing to utilize search function>
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:20 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Yeah let's talk about Dad ballads or something
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:20 am
by 96583UP
..... and we’re back
[url]http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.phpf=15&t=5107&p=1140337&hilit=“spritzy+punk”#p1140337[/url]
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:20 am
by 96583UP
damn bbs!
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:21 am
by Jorge
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:22 am
by 96583UP
LOFL
that’s the kind of thing that gets a person elected president these days
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:23 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Jorge wins
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:24 am
by 96583UP
enough of this flim flam
let’s get down to brass tax
who’s a spritzer and who’s not
i think it’s time for some OP candidates
and from there we white-knuckle our way down to the true spaghetti-wristers
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Wed February 19, 2020 3:30 am
by 96583UP
maybe this should be this year’s RMarch Madness tournament
‘Pearl Jam’s Worst Spritzy Punker’
i think we could scrape out a decent size chunk of candidates
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Thu February 20, 2020 10:09 am
by Ms Harmless
there are absolutely spritzers on Vitalogy
compare and contrast:
da-da, da da da! (spin the black circle!)
da-da, da da da! (spin the black, spin the black!)
and
daaaa! daaaa! daaa! da, da, da, da! (super blood wolf moon...!)
daaaa! daaaa! daaa! da, da, da, da! (super blood wolf moon...!)
Re: Spritzy punkers
Posted: Thu February 20, 2020 11:25 am
by Anders
Would you say that Vitalogy was the godfather of spritz?