McParadigm wrote:All those later records are better written, and are very much the big payoff of the early explorations, but that 1964-66 period is really the heart of the art, as it were....that moment of total, almost blind inventive drive that ultimately created this incredible sound....a band that could balance their music on the absolute precipice of chaos, could do so indefinitely, and would sneer and strut while they did it.
Here, here.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 5:57 pm
by Jorge
Where?
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 5:57 pm
by Norah
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm going to start this thread by saying the original version of A Quick One, While He's Away (which can be found on the 30 Years Maximum R&B box set) is the version to listen to.
That's great, but it's not the original version. It's a Frankenstein hybrid of the original version and the rock & roll circus version. Most of the liner notes/descriptions for that box set are completely wrong because the Who's production team are a bunch of fucktards.
Where can one find the true original version?
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 5:58 pm
by Norah
theplatypus wrote:Where?
I can't believe I did that. I correct people who say here here instead of hear hear all the time!
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 6:01 pm
by Farmer John
Lament wrote:The Who By Numbers is another great record, though sadly underrated.
I love Who By Numbers. "Slip Kid" is easily one of my favourite Who songs.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 6:09 pm
by Wendy Carlos's Twin
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Where can one find the true original version?
On the "A Quick One" album.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 6:18 pm
by Norah
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Where can one find the true original version?
On the "A Quick One" album.
So basically I just prefer the rawness (and the DON'T JOIN IN!) of the rock and roll circus live version.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 6:46 pm
by Wendy Carlos's Twin
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Where can one find the true original version?
On the "A Quick One" album.
So basically I just prefer the rawness (and the DON'T JOIN IN!) of the rock and roll circus live version.
There's a soundtrack album where you can get the full version.
Re: The Who
Posted: Wed January 28, 2015 10:27 am
by joostone
Been listening to their records all week, haven't done that in a while. Still really one of the all-time greats, but I have a feeling their popularity is at a low nowadays. They don't seem to find as many new and young fans discovering their music as let's say Led Zeppelin.
Speaking of discovering, some solo records are also really really good (althought most suck... ).
But these are fantastic:
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 4:46 am
by Kevin Davis
Fact: the forgotten single "Dogs" has been my favorite Who song for the past couple years:
Also, I think the best version of "A Quick One" is the one from the BBC Sessions album.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 5:10 am
by Strat
Kevin Davis wrote:Fact: the forgotten single "Dogs" has been my favorite Who song for the past couple years:
Also, I think the best version of "A Quick One" is the one from the BBC Sessions album.
Sorry KD. you are wrong 1 more time:
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 5:16 am
by Norah
The 30 Years Maximum R&B version is the best version.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 5:17 am
by Strat
sorry to be a PJ dork but MMJ and EV version is so amazing.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 12:46 pm
by Kevin Davis
I find the live/studio transitions in the "Maximum R&B" version too jarring; I actually think the simple existence of that weird hybrid version is kind of baffling. This is the sweet stuff for me:
I don't really care for My Morning Jacket, so that cover ain't even coming close for me. Sorry, Strat.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 1:50 pm
by evenslow
Gimme the raw balls-to-the-wall let's embarrass and destroy the Rolling Stones at their own event madness of the Rock & Roll Circus "Quick One." It's the perfect example of the controlled chaos almost going off the rails but kept in check by the ramrod backbone tone of Pete's Gibson SG Special (it's an ENGINE DRIV-AAAAAAH) each crushing windmill drawing the band back to the epicenter of Maximum R&B long incoherent description over.
DANG
DANG
DANG
DANG
DANG
DANG
DANG
DANG
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 3:25 pm
by Monkey_Driven
Strat wrote:sorry to be a PJ dork but MMJ and EV version is so amazing.
It really is.
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 10:16 pm
by Norah
Kevin Davis wrote:I find the live/studio transitions in the "Maximum R&B" version too jarring; I actually think the simple existence of that weird hybrid version is kind of baffling.
You're a fool. (don't join in!)
Re: The Who
Posted: Fri February 24, 2017 11:33 pm
by Wendy Carlos's Twin
Why are people talking and complaining about that "hybrid" AQO when you can just as easily get the seperate versions complete?
Re: The Who
Posted: Wed July 06, 2022 10:47 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: The Who
Posted: Wed July 06, 2022 10:53 pm
by doug rr
tragabigzanda wrote:Sell Out reissue this Friday: Half-speed remaster from the original tapes, lacquers cut at abbey road. It’s my second favorite Who album so I’m all over this.
inspired by the album cover, i have had many cans of the blue british heinz beans cans around as a piece of "art" for many years..the latest one is sitting on the fire place mantle..