Re: The Creator
Posted: Wed October 18, 2023 1:14 am
With a bunch of Lumetri Speedlooks from the looks of itE.H. Ruddock wrote: It was filmed with a Sony DSLR you can buy at a big box store.
Page 2 of 3
Re: The Creator
Posted: Wed October 18, 2023 1:28 am
So Avatar 2 is better thenJorge wrote:Wow this SUCKED hahaha. I'm kind of shocked at how bad this was, and I don't think it looked especially good. It's impressive if they really made it for that budget (I am skeptical) but it was just a very flimsily written, extremely cliché Lone Wolf and Cub story with some basic Asimov shit, every turn of which can be easily predicted far in advance, and which looks fairly generic in terms of its filmmaking. Bad bad bad
Re: The Creator
Posted: Wed October 18, 2023 1:28 am
BafflingEnsign9 wrote: gorgeous-to-look-at
Re: The Creator
Posted: Wed October 18, 2023 1:28 am
Very easilyVinylGuy wrote:So Avatar 2 is better thenJorge wrote:Wow this SUCKED hahaha. I'm kind of shocked at how bad this was, and I don't think it looked especially good. It's impressive if they really made it for that budget (I am skeptical) but it was just a very flimsily written, extremely cliché Lone Wolf and Cub story with some basic Asimov shit, every turn of which can be easily predicted far in advance, and which looks fairly generic in terms of its filmmaking. Bad bad bad
Re: The Creator
Posted: Wed October 18, 2023 2:45 am
Yeah I never doubt it but cool
Re: The Creator
Posted: Thu December 07, 2023 6:33 pm
I’ll finish the rest later but this is bad.
Two movies in a row with Sturgill Simpson, who shouldn’t pursue acting.
Two movies in a row with Sturgill Simpson, who shouldn’t pursue acting.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Thu December 07, 2023 6:38 pm
I was excited about this because of Gareth Edwards but I also didn’t like it at all. I’m not convinced John David Washington is leading man material.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Thu December 07, 2023 6:51 pm
I think he just hasn't been very lucky in his choice of movie yetVitalogist wrote:I was excited about this because of Gareth Edwards but I also didn’t like it at all. I’m not convinced John David Washington is leading man material.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Thu December 07, 2023 6:56 pm
he doesn't seem to have much personality.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 3:44 pm
In an ironic twist, I’m convinced AI penned this stupid screenplay.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 4:52 pm
Loved the aesthetic, but yes the screenplay and lead were bang average. I'm surprised so many of you are offended by this movie's existence, though, considering your comic book movie diets.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 5:40 pm
Honestly this was worse than The Marvels
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 5:41 pm
Now you're just being ridiculous.Jorge wrote:Honestly this was worse than The Marvels
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 5:47 pm
Both bad movies, but there's a dopey charm to The Marvels (mainly Iman Vellani) that elevates it slightly from this self serious slop
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 6:50 pm
who was offended?Ello Sailor wrote:Loved the aesthetic, but yes the screenplay and lead were bang average. I'm surprised so many of you are offended by this movie's existence, though, considering your comic book movie diets.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 7:05 pm
I'm assuming Joey.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 7:06 pm
Also, Jorge has a voodoo doll of the lead actor, which seems a little excessive.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 7:11 pm
how very dare youEllo Sailor wrote:I'm assuming Joey.
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 7:12 pm
Re: The Creator
Posted: Sat December 09, 2023 11:51 pm
Stop itJorge wrote:Honestly this was worse than The Marvels