Page 2 of 2

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Sun September 15, 2024 12:24 am
by BurtReynolds
Hum

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Sun September 15, 2024 6:46 pm
by Superblood Wolfmoon
Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Tue September 17, 2024 10:22 pm
by Jammer XCI
I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Morbid Angel
Hard disagree, but agree in certain circumstances? I love Formulas Fatal to the Flesh but even Tucker's best material wasn't as good as Altars through Domination. But then again, I'd much rather take anything Tucker including Heretic over that goddamn terrible Illud Divinidum whatever reunion album from 2011, that shit was inexcusably awful. In 2024 I'd probably rather see David Vincent and Pete Sandoval's Morbid Angel stand-in project live over Morbid Angel again though, Trey is beyond fried.
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.
Blind kinda fucking rules though. The albums they put out without Pepper in the 2010's were trash though.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 12:01 am
by LoathedVermin72
Jammer XCI wrote:I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Morbid Angel
Hard disagree, but agree in certain circumstances? I love Formulas Fatal to the Flesh but even Tucker's best material wasn't as good as Altars through Domination. But then again, I'd much rather take anything Tucker including Heretic over that goddamn terrible Illud Divinidum whatever reunion album from 2011, that shit was inexcusably awful. In 2024 I'd probably rather see David Vincent and Pete Sandoval's Morbid Angel stand-in project live over Morbid Angel again though, Trey is beyond fried.
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.
Blind kinda fucking rules though. The albums they put out without Pepper in the 2010's were trash though.
The only MA albums I care about are Gateways to Annihilation and Kingdoms Disdained. I don’t like David Vincent’s voice at all, especially now that he’s ruining Blasphemer’s music in Vltimas.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 1:48 pm
by lvc
Van Halen. But which switch? It's a mystery.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 3:05 pm
by BurtReynolds
Jammer XCI wrote:I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
They would like to pretend their first album doesn't exist, but it's not bad. Just doesn't sound like Hum.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 8:35 pm
by oasisfan35
lvc wrote:Van Halen. But which switch? It's a mystery.
Not to Sammy.

I honestly prefer my Van Halen with no vocals at all.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 8:45 pm
by darth_vedder
bada wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Genesis
I like a real specific era of Genesis. Like 80-83. Not that I dislike what came before and to a certain extent after but I think its their ideal iteration.
I think I'm with you. I know it's cooler to rattle off some Gabriel led Genesis tunes, but I like that spot when they were making hits but not pure 80's cheese yet. Maybe like late 70's / early 80's. I do like some of the Peter Gabriel materiel, but overall it's just not my thing.