Re: Soundtracks to the End of the World: The Post-Rock threa
Posted: Thu October 17, 2013 3:36 pm
I thought I was the only one. They kinda drone on too much for me. Still, I do really like some of their songs. You might like God is an Astronaut. They are a little lighter and peppy sounding, and a little more electronic.harmless wrote:Also, I've spent a few years trying to get into Russian Circles, and concluded that I like the idea more often than I like the execution.
Hmm, really? Russian Circles drone on? That's not the feeling I'm getting from them. They're closer to post-metal than to post-rock.BurtReynolds wrote:I thought I was the only one. They kinda drone on too much for me. Still, I do really like some of their songs. You might like God is an Astronaut. They are a little lighter and peppy sounding, and a little more electronic.harmless wrote:Also, I've spent a few years trying to get into Russian Circles, and concluded that I like the idea more often than I like the execution.
Not the best word. I mean they are just kinda LOUD ALL THE TIME AND CONSTANTLY MAKING NOISE. I prefer more peaks and valleys and monster crescendos.Heathen wrote:Hmm, really? Russian Circles drone on? That's not the feeling I'm getting from them. They're closer to post-metal than to post-rock.BurtReynolds wrote:I thought I was the only one. They kinda drone on too much for me. Still, I do really like some of their songs. You might like God is an Astronaut. They are a little lighter and peppy sounding, and a little more electronic.harmless wrote:Also, I've spent a few years trying to get into Russian Circles, and concluded that I like the idea more often than I like the execution.
1. Mogwai (head and shoulders above all bands in the universe)turned2black wrote:Rank 'em!
I'm pretty easy as far as predictability is concerned.harmless wrote:The problem with Russian Circles for me is that their component parts just aren't very interesting. There are too many predictable chord structures, stereotypically easy drum parts... I just find it far too easy to predict where each song is going to go. Not with all of their songs, but with a lot of them. I like the idea of the more "classical movements" approach to rock music, but beyond that, I just find their actual approach to hard rock music itself fairly boring.
Hey, mind your Tanners!BurtReynolds wrote:I'm pretty easy as far as predictability is concerned.harmless wrote:The problem with Russian Circles for me is that their component parts just aren't very interesting. There are too many predictable chord structures, stereotypically easy drum parts... I just find it far too easy to predict where each song is going to go. Not with all of their songs, but with a lot of them. I like the idea of the more "classical movements" approach to rock music, but beyond that, I just find their actual approach to hard rock music itself fairly boring.
- Spoiler: show
Ah, I see. I disagree but I see.BurtReynolds wrote:Not the best word. I mean they are just kinda LOUD ALL THE TIME AND CONSTANTLY MAKING NOISE. I prefer more peaks and valleys and monster crescendos.Heathen wrote:Hmm, really? Russian Circles drone on? That's not the feeling I'm getting from them. They're closer to post-metal than to post-rock.BurtReynolds wrote:I thought I was the only one. They kinda drone on too much for me. Still, I do really like some of their songs. You might like God is an Astronaut. They are a little lighter and peppy sounding, and a little more electronic.harmless wrote:Also, I've spent a few years trying to get into Russian Circles, and concluded that I like the idea more often than I like the execution.
Yup.BurtReynolds wrote:1. Mogwai (head and shoulders above all bands in the universe)

Without that it might as well be Tayler Swift.theplatypus wrote:It appears that a prerequisite to being a post-rock band is to have song titles that sound like lines from a 15-year-old's poetry journal.