Mike interview Esquire

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by BurtReynolds »

great thread.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by stip »

harmless wrote:It depends what Mike meant. Was he asking to play "a lead guitar" (as in, any number of types of guitar part which could be played by a lead guitarist) or was he asking to play a solo (consisting of improvised notes and noodling)? I guess we'll never know. But a lead guitar is just a guitar which is played over a bedrock laid down by a rhythm guitar. The actual part played can be a solo, another part consisting of chords, or a separate rhythm part, but it's usually a bit more prominent in the mix, and played higher up. All of this may be wrong because I'm not a guitarist...
is the lead guitarist the one responsible for the beats?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
harmless wrote:It depends what Mike meant. Was he asking to play "a lead guitar" (as in, any number of types of guitar part which could be played by a lead guitarist) or was he asking to play a solo (consisting of improvised notes and noodling)? I guess we'll never know. But a lead guitar is just a guitar which is played over a bedrock laid down by a rhythm guitar. The actual part played can be a solo, another part consisting of chords, or a separate rhythm part, but it's usually a bit more prominent in the mix, and played higher up. All of this may be wrong because I'm not a guitarist...
is the lead guitarist the one responsible for the beats?
Is that a serious question? I assumed the previous one had been a serious question but if not, carry on.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by stip »

harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:It depends what Mike meant. Was he asking to play "a lead guitar" (as in, any number of types of guitar part which could be played by a lead guitarist) or was he asking to play a solo (consisting of improvised notes and noodling)? I guess we'll never know. But a lead guitar is just a guitar which is played over a bedrock laid down by a rhythm guitar. The actual part played can be a solo, another part consisting of chords, or a separate rhythm part, but it's usually a bit more prominent in the mix, and played higher up. All of this may be wrong because I'm not a guitarist...
is the lead guitarist the one responsible for the beats?
Is that a serious question? I assumed the previous one had been a serious question but if not, carry on.
the first one was.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by stip »

back to the first one, asking to play a lead is just asking to be the lead guitarist, then? A lead is not a particular moment like a solo is?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mike interview Esquire

Post by harmless »

I think the question was just "Can I play lead guitar?" but I don't know. A lead could be a solo, but I would have thought Mike would be more specific if that's what he meant.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Post Reply