Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by McParadigm »

PryTo wrote:hence my initial wondering whether anyone has ever gotten so much glory for being so utterly talentless.
Anthony Kiedis.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Jorge »

Good call
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
holdtightthething
A Return To Form
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 8:44 pm

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by holdtightthething »

Maybe William Shatner? He is a truly awful actor.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Jorge »

And yet so gifted at sprechstimme.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
dsb1218
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun July 14, 2013 6:42 pm
Twitter: @davidscottbrown

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by dsb1218 »

McParadigm wrote:
PryTo wrote:hence my initial wondering whether anyone has ever gotten so much glory for being so utterly talentless.
Anthony Kiedis.
AND he's got that statutory rape thing going for him, per his autobiography.
My head ain't filled with nothin'
but cats and rockin' chairs
User avatar
knee tunes
for those who
are not...shall be
Posts: 8505
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 7:30 am
Location: nothing

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by knee tunes »

Image
Vitalogist wrote:As a hotel manager, you can imagine the amount of beige I’ve seen in my career.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Iholdthepain »

holdtightthething wrote:Maybe William Shatner? He is a truly awful actor.
Image
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Birds in Hell »

holdtightthething wrote:I would rather listen to this than Counting Crows.
No shit.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45832
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by BurtReynolds »

Is there a third option?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by mastaflatch »

BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Jorge »

mastaflatch wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
Ugh, even worse
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45832
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by BurtReynolds »

theplatypus wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
Ugh, even worse
For real. Too much choice is frightening.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by mastaflatch »

theplatypus wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
Ugh, even worse
i quite like this song of theirs though:

but Owner of a Lonely Heart sucks.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Iholdthepain »

mastaflatch wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by McParadigm »

Iholdthepain wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there a third option?
yes.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by bada »

Shatner made me cry in Star Trek II the guy is a master. "His was the most <choke> human". Start the water works.
User avatar
PryTo
AnalLog
Posts: 1009
Joined: Wed December 18, 2013 5:27 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by PryTo »

He's never topped this bad boy.

"Youuu answer quite slowly ... a GIRL ..."

User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

I love how this Yoko-bashing thread has developed into a thread about Shatner. Well played.
User avatar
Fuzzcharger
Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Fuzzcharger »

holdtightthething wrote:I would rather listen to this than Counting Crows.
I can dig this.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Yoko Ono is f-ing awful at Glastonbury

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

I like her vocals on this:



and this



and this



Usually when people critique Yoko, they cite the most unappealing/challenging aspects of her work rather than the good aspects. I wonder why that is. :roll:
Post Reply