Rangi Guy wrote:This is not the thread I posted that link in
You're welcome.
Cheers B, but how else am I supposed to piss off Alex?
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sun April 19, 2015 8:23 pm
by epilogue
Rangi Guy wrote:
B wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:This is not the thread I posted that link in
You're welcome.
Cheers B, but how else am I supposed to piss off Alex?
You could piss in his cheerios.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:40 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Not sure if this was posted in the other Star Wars thread, but even if it was, it should be here:
This is going to completely fucking demolish all the other new SW movies. I love Gareth Edwards so much.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 2:32 am
by E.H. Ruddock
How can you tell from that?
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 2:35 am
by Kaius
He can't.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 2:45 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Is that supposed to be the silhouette of a death star? That looks too big
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 3:21 am
by LoathedVermin72
There's more vision and tactility in those two images than in the entire Force Awakens trailer. And yes, that's the Death Star.
Also, I can pretty much tell just by you telling me one movie is made by Abrams and the other is made by Edwards.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 3:33 am
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:There's more vision and tactility in those two images than in the entire Force Awakens trailer. And yes, that's the Death Star.
Also, I can pretty much tell just by you telling me one movie is made by Abrams and the other is made by Edwards.
Fart noise
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 3:54 am
by BurtReynolds
that giant background deathstar will look great next to the giant background star destroyer in the other trailer. what other giant things can we put in the background?
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 3:59 am
by BurtReynolds
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Is that supposed to be the silhouette of a death star? That looks too big
I think gravity would be wrecking shit at that size.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:03 am
by Mecca
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Is that supposed to be the silhouette of a death star? That looks too big
I think gravity would be wrecking shit at that size.
it all depends on the total mass of the death star. consider that there's a lot of hallways and ducts leading to trash compactors and great caverns within which bodies pile up, so its not made up of the mass of say a planet or a moon.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:03 am
by Mecca
or you know, its fucking star wars
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:04 am
by BurtReynolds
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Is that supposed to be the silhouette of a death star? That looks too big
I think gravity would be wrecking shit at that size.
it all depends on the total mass of the death star. consider that there's a lot of hallways and ducts leading to trash compactors and great caverns within which bodies pile up, so its not made up of the mass of say a planet or a moon.
nerd
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:15 am
by LoathedVermin72
BurtReynolds wrote:
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Is that supposed to be the silhouette of a death star? That looks too big
I think gravity would be wrecking shit at that size.
it all depends on the total mass of the death star. consider that there's a lot of hallways and ducts leading to trash compactors and great caverns within which bodies pile up, so its not made up of the mass of say a planet or a moon.
nerd
yeah jesus christ wtf
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:16 am
by Mecca
you can't just focus on the setup without the "or its fucking star wars" comment that follows