Re: Right Song/Wrong Album: Vitalogy
Posted: Mon June 29, 2015 1:31 pm
I don't find Brain of J out of place on Yield at all.
Seconded. Also, BOJ would be all wrong if Irons weren't drumming on it. He owns that song.cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't find Brain of J out of place on Yield at all.
I think it's perfectly placed on Yield, but may have felt out of place if it did anything other than open. I agree with McParadigm that it feels connected to that Vitalogy-era, but it also has a foot forward into the things they're doing with Yield. I love the way it acts like a bridge, and by the end of the first three songs, you've pretty quickly and effectively transitioned out of what the band was doing on previous albums into what they were trying to accomplish on Yield.cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't find Brain of J out of place on Yield at all.
It debuted in 95, didn't it?McParadigm wrote:Yes, if only the sound and feel of this stupid, stupid song could be greatly improved.stip wrote:It wouldn't. But the sound and feel of this session would have greatly improved the song
I don't want it added to the album proper, but Brain of J should really have been a Vitalogy or a No Code b-side. It's not a bad song, but it just fits that era a lot better than it does Yield. I halfway feel that the only reason it's on that record is that they wanted to open with a rocker, and most of what they were writing at that time was midtempo.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Seconded. Also, BOJ would be all wrong if Irons weren't drumming on it. He owns that song.cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't find Brain of J out of place on Yield at all.
I don't think MFS should be on Vitalogy, but I do find it to be one of the better songs on LB.McParadigm wrote:Yes, if only the sound and feel of this stupid, stupid song could be greatly improved.stip wrote:It wouldn't. But the sound and feel of this session would have greatly improved the song
I don't want it added to the album proper, but Brain of J should really have been a Vitalogy or a No Code b-side. It's not a bad song, but it just fits that era a lot better than it does Yield. I halfway feel that the only reason it's on that record is that they wanted to open with a rocker, and most of what they were writing at that time was midtempo.
Good work on this postE.H. Ruddock wrote:Whenever I see bodysnatcher post in PJ chat I think "Right Message Board/Wrong Forum".
b'snatch is one of my favorite posters ever. I feel like his talents are being wasted in the PJ chat forum though. I want to hear more about his scooter rides to work, yanno?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Good work on this postE.H. Ruddock wrote:Whenever I see bodysnatcher post in PJ chat I think "Right Message Board/Wrong Forum".
if it didn't have the calypso bridge...darth_vedder wrote:
I don't think MFS should be on Vitalogy, but I do find it to be one of the better songs on LB.
The bridge is awesome. Wouldn't mind a guitar solo.96583UP wrote:if it didn't have the calypso bridge...darth_vedder wrote:
I don't think MFS should be on Vitalogy, but I do find it to be one of the better songs on LB.
and if it had a searing guitar solo... it might just be a weiner.
i have to give Ed credit for sounding like he's trying to sing in that one shouty verse on it though...
although doesn't seem replicable live, without a severe tune down, and a ukelele solo, and an official sticker set, and a PJ25 dildo pre-sale code
Have we ever gotten confirmation that this song is a first person account of Dr Evil's son?Kaius wrote:Yes. Those are the only things.
McParadigm wrote:Have we ever gotten confirmation that this song is a first person account of Dr Evil's son?Kaius wrote:Yes. Those are the only things.
