Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 1:59 pm
I still haven't finished the original series. 
TV seasons are just too damn long. Filler seems inevitable. I really enjoyed the first few episodes but once it started dragging its feet like every other show I lost interest.durdencommatyler wrote:It's been a long time since I rewatched. I should do that soon.
Yeah, the entire first season (only 7 episodes) is outstanding, front to back. Once David and Mark took a backseat it started to flounder. The final run of episodes gets back to its original glory. But I won't pretend that every episode is good, let alone great. But the whole experience is greater than the sum of its parts. Totally worth the journey.LoathedVermin72 wrote:TV seasons are just too damn long. Filler seems inevitable. I really enjoyed the first few episodes but once it started dragging its feet like every other show I lost interest.durdencommatyler wrote:It's been a long time since I rewatched. I should do that soon.
That certainly had a lot to do with it, too.Mine wrote:I think the big issue with season 2 is that ABC forced them to reveal Laura's killer earlier than they intended to. The Windom Earl plot and the other minor subplots failed to give the show a life beyond the original plot.
Me too friend. I just think it's one of the best things I've ever seen on TV and I'm over the moon that it's back!washing machine wrote:Even the awful late series arcs have grown to hold a certain stupid charm for me. I love this show so much.
washing machine wrote:I happened upon an Apple Music playlist the other day called "The Pink Room," containing that track from Fire Walk With Me and a bunch of songs both modern and classic that would have fit in with that universe. I got so excited just hearing the drums on "The Pink Room" that I re-watched the entire series again.
Fantastic playlist from start to finish, FYI. Joey, you'd love it. http://mixing.io/playlist/apple-music-a ... -pink-room
The thing is the solution to the mystery went beyond just revealing a killer. It creates a situation that is impossible to follow linearly because the viewer ends up having too much information to keep being interested.durdencommatyler wrote:That certainly had a lot to do with it, too.Mine wrote:I think the big issue with season 2 is that ABC forced them to reveal Laura's killer earlier than they intended to. The Windom Earl plot and the other minor subplots failed to give the show a life beyond the original plot.
Here's where we disagree. Twin Peaks was at its best when both of those guys were involved. One without the other, or the show without either isn't Twin Peaks.Mine wrote:The thing is the solution to the mystery went beyond just revealing a killer. It creates a situation that is impossible to follow linearly because the viewer ends up having too much information to keep being interested.durdencommatyler wrote:That certainly had a lot to do with it, too.Mine wrote:I think the big issue with season 2 is that ABC forced them to reveal Laura's killer earlier than they intended to. The Windom Earl plot and the other minor subplots failed to give the show a life beyond the original plot.
The 2 seasons should have been about the Laura mystery and following seasons could have been the BOB origin story or something similar that still explores the same world without having to peak up in time where it left.
Lynch did Fire Walk With Me which wasn't received very well so i'm not sure him and Frost being more involved would have been enough to save the show.
I think we actually agree.durdencommatyler wrote:Here's where we disagree. Twin Peaks was at its best when both of those guys were involved. One without the other, or the show without either isn't Twin Peaks.Mine wrote:The thing is the solution to the mystery went beyond just revealing a killer. It creates a situation that is impossible to follow linearly because the viewer ends up having too much information to keep being interested.durdencommatyler wrote:That certainly had a lot to do with it, too.Mine wrote:I think the big issue with season 2 is that ABC forced them to reveal Laura's killer earlier than they intended to. The Windom Earl plot and the other minor subplots failed to give the show a life beyond the original plot.
The 2 seasons should have been about the Laura mystery and following seasons could have been the BOB origin story or something similar that still explores the same world without having to peak up in time where it left.
Lynch did Fire Walk With Me which wasn't received very well so i'm not sure him and Frost being more involved would have been enough to save the show.
Mine wrote:I think we actually agree.durdencommatyler wrote:Here's where we disagree. Twin Peaks was at its best when both of those guys were involved. One without the other, or the show without either isn't Twin Peaks.Mine wrote:The thing is the solution to the mystery went beyond just revealing a killer. It creates a situation that is impossible to follow linearly because the viewer ends up having too much information to keep being interested.durdencommatyler wrote:That certainly had a lot to do with it, too.Mine wrote:I think the big issue with season 2 is that ABC forced them to reveal Laura's killer earlier than they intended to. The Windom Earl plot and the other minor subplots failed to give the show a life beyond the original plot.
The 2 seasons should have been about the Laura mystery and following seasons could have been the BOB origin story or something similar that still explores the same world without having to peak up in time where it left.
Lynch did Fire Walk With Me which wasn't received very well so i'm not sure him and Frost being more involved would have been enough to save the show.
The murder mystery was a huge part of the show's appeal.
I think the network interfering with their vision for the show caused them to lose interest and created a situation (the reveal) that wasn't supposed to happen. This took the show in a direction Frost and Lynch didn't intend it go which is why i think the show wasn't able to recover, at least in the ratings.
So yeah, Twin Peaks works best when both of them are in control.
Aw huhBirds in Hell wrote:I definitely think the original run of Twin Peaks would've worked more successfully, and been easier for David and Mark to manage, had the network had the foresight to let them stick with seven or eight tightly-focused episodes per series (like the flawless first series).
I'm also vibrating with excitement at the idea of more Badalamenti-penned Twin Peaks music.