Re: Best Candidate from the Worst Party
Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 7:48 pm
Whatever happened to Bloomburg?
I go back-and-forth on this, too, but as you seem to do in this post, Joey, for me it comes down to: there are certain issues that I think are fundamental civil/human rights issues, and if a candidate steps over the line on even just one of those, they're basically crossed off the list for me.durdencommatyler wrote:And I get what you're saying. One can't be a one issue voter...But god, why do these men have to be so gross about these important issues?
Jesus, I don't know how anyone can watch this shrill kind of comedy/political commentary/whatever.durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:Kasich actually did some good work on welfare and an Earned Income Credit for his state.Chris_H_2 wrote:Kasich's a solid candidate who would probably win in the general election. Which is why the Republicans won't nominate him.
Kasich?.... Kasich...?
No thank you.
We definitely have to be in the right mood to watch Samantha Bee or John Oliver. The intro song alone is enough to give me a headache.Birds in Hell wrote:Jesus, I don't know how anyone can watch this shrill kind of comedy/political commentary/whatever.durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:Kasich actually did some good work on welfare and an Earned Income Credit for his state.Chris_H_2 wrote:Kasich's a solid candidate who would probably win in the general election. Which is why the Republicans won't nominate him.
Kasich?.... Kasich...?
No thank you.
That said, given I knew nothing about him before, Kasich comes across like a decent, principled guy in this.
me too. One of the weaker correspondents during a stretch where there were a ton of great onestommymtcom wrote:I always thought she was terrible on TDS.