Page 2 of 2
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 6:13 am
by Fuzzcharger
tragabigzanda wrote:http://consequenceofsound.net/2016/08/pearl-jam-played-against-type-but-its-paid-off/
This was good. I agree it could have been a bit longer. I could do with out another PJ & Nirvana comparison but I guess it's inevitable. I always get a bit sad when I think about the possibilities Nirvana or Cobain's musical output could have been over 20 years. I've appreciated PJ's longevity and evolution more as I've got older especially as I stopped listening to Nirvana a while ago as it's too heavily associated with high school and university for me to listen now.
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 1:46 pm
by Jorge
Dad rock wasn’t even a coined term back in 1996, but No Code fits the bill pretty well
uh
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 1:59 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 3:25 pm
by VinylGuy
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 3:45 pm
by Kevin Davis
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Fri August 26, 2016 3:56 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Sat August 27, 2016 6:01 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Sat August 27, 2016 6:07 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 2:01 pm
by stip
tragabigzanda wrote:Also, that last article sucks and is a pretty stupid way to close out their week of reflection.
its a pretty accurate summation of my history with that album
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 4:12 pm
by tragabigzanda
Re: Consequence of Sound Celebrates Pearl Jam
Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 7:57 pm
by stip
all right! I'm at least one step above sucks!