Do any of you PJ naysayers...

[LetMeSleep]

MITS is top drawer. One of the best from the album. Awesome drumming and good work from Ed.

[nightmareblack0206]

MITS is top drawer. One of the best from the album. Awesome drumming and good work from Ed.

Agreed

[Birds in Hell]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

[Jorge]

I hate Marker and Gone. Marker would have been salvageable if it had an extended jam in the middle, but is mostly cannot stand that song.

Are you saying "I hate Marker. I wish it was longer." ?

I think I'm agreeing with whoever said the verses are pearl jam by numbers. I like the breakdown in the middle and wish that was longer. That would turn it into a song I don't skip over.

*Edit - I just realized they said it was the chorus, not the verse. The chorus and that little jam I really do enjoy. The verses kill the song for me. I absolutely hate that main riff of the song.

Interesting. I feel the opposite. I like the verses a lot-- they're menacing, exciting, propulsive. Then the chorus comes along and it's just a soggy, sloppy misfire.

[Norah]

I hate Marker and Gone. Marker would have been salvageable if it had an extended jam in the middle, but is mostly cannot stand that song.

Are you saying "I hate Marker. I wish it was longer." ?

I think I'm agreeing with whoever said the verses are pearl jam by numbers. I like the breakdown in the middle and wish that was longer. That would turn it into a song I don't skip over.

*Edit - I just realized they said it was the chorus, not the verse. The chorus and that little jam I really do enjoy. The verses kill the song for me. I absolutely hate that main riff of the song.

Interesting. I feel the opposite. I like the verses a lot-- they're menacing, exciting, propulsive. Then the chorus comes along and it's just a soggy, sloppy misfire.

Yeah the verses are the best part.

[WtOB?]

I like how the chorus has that different flow than the verses, it's kinda like the weird up and down flow of LBC.

[Kevin Davis]

"Marker" is one of my favorite Pearl Jam songs. I've never understood the objections to the chorus--I think it's fantastic.

[Kevin Davis]

I like how the chorus has that different flow than the verses, it's kinda like the weird up and down flow of LBC.

The verses are like you're free falling out of a plane, thrashing maniacally in the wind; the chorus is like the moment when your chute opens and you begin coasting smoothly to the ground in triumphant, major-key majesty.

[WtOB?]

I like how the chorus has that different flow than the verses, it's kinda like the weird up and down flow of LBC.

The verses are like you're free falling out of a plane, thrashing maniacally in the wind; the chorus is like the moment when your chute opens and you begin coasting smoothly to the ground in triumphant, major-key majesty.

[yofismom]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

Def agree it's a song that is much more appealing live. I guess that's true for a lot of songs but if you made a chart of songs most improved by their best live versions, this would be higher than most.

And let's face it, SH and also Comatose (though I like it less) are tremendous live.

[darth_vedder]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

Def agree it's a song that is much more appealing live. I guess that's true for a lot of songs but if you made a chart of songs most improved by their best live versions, this would be higher than most.

And let's face it, SH and also Comatose (though I like it less) are tremendous live.

Totally disagree with the both of you. MITS is better in the studio. Then again, the song wasn't played a lot live, so it's very possible I haven't heard the version(s) that you both think are better. Also, I'm in the camp where I prefer almost everything PJ does in the studio better than live versions.

[Birds in Hell]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

Def agree it's a song that is much more appealing live. I guess that's true for a lot of songs but if you made a chart of songs most improved by their best live versions, this would be higher than most.

And let's face it, SH and also Comatose (though I like it less) are tremendous live.

Totally disagree with the both of you. MITS is better in the studio. Then again, the song wasn't played a lot live, so it's very possible I haven't heard the version(s) that you both think are better. Also, I'm in the camp where I prefer almost everything PJ does in the studio better than live versions.

I am too for the most part, but Marker is a definite exception. I thought they nailed it most nights in 2006, especially through the European leg (one example is on the Black Market Avocado compilation I put together, if you'll permit the self-promotion.)

[darth_vedder]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

Def agree it's a song that is much more appealing live. I guess that's true for a lot of songs but if you made a chart of songs most improved by their best live versions, this would be higher than most.

And let's face it, SH and also Comatose (though I like it less) are tremendous live.

Totally disagree with the both of you. MITS is better in the studio. Then again, the song wasn't played a lot live, so it's very possible I haven't heard the version(s) that you both think are better. Also, I'm in the camp where I prefer almost everything PJ does in the studio better than live versions.

I am too for the most part, but Marker is a definite exception. I thought they nailed it most nights in 2006, especially through the European leg (one example is on the Black Market Avocado compilation I put together, if you'll permit the self-promotion.)

I have that! I'm gonna listen when I get home

[darth_vedder]

So...I don't want to wait till I get home...What version of MITS is used on your Black Market mix? I'll look for it on the internets.

[Birds in Hell]

So...I don't want to wait till I get home...What version of MITS is used on your Black Market mix? I'll look for it on the internets.

Prague 2006.

[darth_vedder]

^Thanks!

I didn't see it on YouTube, but did get see this one. It's pretty good:

[Thejambi]

I didn't much care for the album version but the live versions of Marker from the 2006 tour were excellent. That instrumental bridge is great. It's a shame that it has virtually disappeared from their live repertoire (and that it wasn't captured more successfully in the studio.)

Def agree it's a song that is much more appealing live. I guess that's true for a lot of songs but if you made a chart of songs most improved by their best live versions, this would be higher than most.

And let's face it, SH and also Comatose (though I like it less) are tremendous live.

Totally disagree with the both of you. MITS is better in the studio. Then again, the song wasn't played a lot live, so it's very possible I haven't heard the version(s) that you both think are better. Also, I'm in the camp where I prefer almost everything PJ does in the studio better than live versions.

I just wish the studio versions weren't so slow.

[warehouse]

i love everything about 'marker in the sand'. matt's drumming is the first thing that stands out. i love the riff. its def got a pearl jam feel to it, but not in a bad way like they are overly trying to sound like a pearl jam riff. the chrous is like a totally different song. its like the opposite of the frenzy of the verse, it confidently sores through the song. i also love the way they last verse comes out of the bridge. i'm not sure whats going on musically there, but it kinda gives me a boner. they only complaint i could have is that the ending could have been jammed out a little longer, but to me this song holds up to any material they've ever made.

[EJ]

I'm with you. I think its the best song on S/T, with Parachutes close behind. My only criticism, as others have mentioned, would be the terrible recording. If the guitars sounded a little beefier, I think it'd be a lot more popular.

[darth_vedder]

^Same thoughts here too. We all know S/T sucks with production, but even still, MITS and Parachutes are my favorites from it.