Red Mosquito

just beware the full moon

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/women-cand ... elections/

Women candidates poised to make history in 2018 midterm elections

[...]

A record 53 women ran to be elected to the Senate and 476 women ran for the House of Representatives in 2018. Twenty-two of them won party nominations to the Senate and 235 won party nominations to the House. Those 257 women will be on ballots in midterm elections in November.

[...]

oops wrong thread

feel free to move to the midterms thread

Elizabeth Warren is not POTUS ready

the fact she did this stupid DNA test shows she can't shake trumpism

Biden or Bloomberg, please

ty

Biden?

LOL. NO!

Seth Moulton should run

run2death wrote:Biden?

LOL. NO!

yes I realize it seems crazy

to have a Moderate with decades of government experience including 8 years of white house experience

and crossover-party appeal

but America might be ready for it

96583UP wrote:Elizabeth Warren is not POTUS ready

the fact she did this stupid DNA test shows she can't shake trumpism

Biden or Bloomberg, please

ty

This part seems kinda true to me. After the DNA debacle I'm selling her chances to be the Democratic nominee.

96583UP wrote:

run2death wrote:Biden?

LOL. NO!

yes I realize it seems crazy

to have a Moderate with decades of government experience including 8 years of white house experience

and crossover-party appeal

but America might be ready for it

And to agree with 96583 twice in a row, I think if the Democrats fundamental goal is to win the presidency their best bet is a moderate white guy.

But that might not be their main goal and maybe it shouldn't be.

4/5 wrote:

96583UP wrote:

run2death wrote:Biden?

LOL. NO!

yes I realize it seems crazy

to have a Moderate with decades of government experience including 8 years of white house experience

and crossover-party appeal

but America might be ready for it

And to agree with 96583 twice in a row, I think if the Democrats fundamental goal is to win the presidency their best bet is a moderate white guy.

But that might not be their main goal and maybe it shouldn't be.

I’ll say this, though I am not prone to too much political talk without getting myself in trouble...

One of the main reasons Democrats lose elections, specifically to a Trump, is that they are worried about checking off the appropriate boxes demographically to win offices than focusing on a robust process that produces the right candidate. The Democrats need a primary that is fair, and allows each candidate for president the chance to express why they should be the nominee, and then focus on getting as much consensus on their ultimate nominee as possible.

I at least know that is what I want leading into 2020 as a reliable voter (I have pretty much voted in every election, primary, general election, special election, school board, etc. for 22 years) registered with that party (so I can vote in the primaries).

Over/Under is a dozen for women who come forward saying Biden was inappropriate with them.

bada wrote:Over/Under is a dozen for women who come forward saying Biden was inappropriate with them.

What's the over/under for number of videos that already publicly exist of Biden being inappropriate with women?

i wonder what al franken is up to these days

that's creepy af.

there's definitely a handjob going on under that table

Mike Bloomberg, save us

Anyone hear the theory floating around that Biden could run and choose Obama as his VP?

Dscans wrote:Anyone hear the theory floating around that Biden could run and choose Obama as his VP?

Why on earth would Obama want that?

He would hope there would be an "accident" so he could be president again