Page 11 of 789
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon March 25, 2013 2:14 am
by MadTIGERmaN
The Brewers got a kid sitting at AAA whos hit some bombs this spring... who, from what they say, is "only a Left Fielder" (aka no range for CF, no arm for RF, and no glove for INF) and hes kinda blocked by Braun... would love to see the Crew trade him for some pitching help... I just dont see the Yankees coming after a "prospect" when they want to win now / need help today.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon March 25, 2013 2:33 am
by verb_to_trust
philpritchard wrote:I can't express how excited I am that the Yankees are on the verge of acquiring Vernon Wells.
This would have been a fantastic move.........five years ago.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu March 28, 2013 1:46 am
by MadTIGERmaN
Tim McCarver says 2013 will be his last on Fox... FINALLY!
now if Joe Buck will move on as well...
thats half of what made the WBC games so fun to watch, the great announcing crews...
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu March 28, 2013 8:05 pm
by liebzz
verb_to_trust wrote:philpritchard wrote:I can't express how excited I am that the Yankees are on the verge of acquiring Vernon Wells.
This would have been a fantastic move.........five years ago.
I know they are claiming to want to save money and build from the farm up, but every move by them this year seems to have me looking sideways. Other than resigning Rivera for another year, and taking another chance on Pettitte, I can't say I liked much of any of their moves. Letting Martin go without a suitable replacement on the horizon was dumb, letting Swisher go and then getting desperate and replacing his production with Vernon Wells is the height of terrible, signing Youkilis for so many millions when they could have just gone for...say...resigning Chavez was very strange. My guess is that they've lucked out so much the past few years on taking aging flyers on a few guys that they decided to stack their roster with them. It's gonna hurt, and bad.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri March 29, 2013 1:11 pm
by Electromatic
Watching the Yankees this year is going to be like watching the Lawerence Welk show.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri March 29, 2013 2:40 pm
by Electromatic
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/ne ... t=hp_t2_a8
Oh yeah, guaranteed contracts are awesome, for Johan Santana and Mike Hampton anyway.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri March 29, 2013 4:27 pm
by liebzz
What's everyone's predictions?
AL Divisions: Rays (East), Tigers (Central), Angels (West)*
Wildcards: Blue Jays, Rangers
ALCS: Tigers over Angels
NL Divisions: Nationals (East)*, Reds (Central), Giants (West)
Wildcards: Braves, Cardinals
NLCS: Reds over Nationals
World Series: Tigers over Reds so that Jim Leyland can finally retire in peace.
* - best record in respective league.
Note: I am a Yankee fan and a relatively optimistic fan at that, and I am not expecting them to win more than say 86 wins.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri March 29, 2013 5:21 pm
by @SkitchP
So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri March 29, 2013 6:31 pm
by Electromatic
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
Hopefully Kate Upton.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 7:45 pm
by Chris_H_2
@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 8:54 pm
by @SkitchP
Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 9:18 pm
by Chris_H_2
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 9:18 pm
by @SkitchP
Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 9:42 pm
by Chris_H_2
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat March 30, 2013 10:58 pm
by @SkitchP
Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun March 31, 2013 12:22 am
by Chris_H_2
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun March 31, 2013 12:38 am
by @SkitchP
Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:So Verlander is locked up through 2020. I wonder what we'll get when we trade Max Scherzer next year.
A worse contract than Verlander's?
You dislike the deal?
I'm guessing there's going to be at least $45 million per year in wasted payroll between him and Fielder in about 5 years from now.
You think JV will be done by 35?
Maybe not done, but certainly not a $23 million a year pitcher. I hope I'm wrong and I eat crow, but I think his innings start catching up to him.
I hope not either, but if Detroit didn't give him this contract now, someone else would have (and then some) after 2014.
Probably. But if someone else wanted to give him a huge deal when he's 32, I still wouldn't have a problem with it. They're going to have to re-tool one of these days.
so basically you just want them to sign guys to nothing but one year deals?
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun March 31, 2013 12:53 am
by Norah
You pay superstars a lot of money into their late thirties when you lock them up in long term deals. Sure, you'll be paying more than he's worth on the back end but that's how you sign guys. It's either that or you don't have an elite pitcher.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun March 31, 2013 12:59 am
by Simple Torture
I was explaining to my fiancée how little money the Astros are spending on payroll this year and said that they are "probably the worst team in the league." She responded with, "What about the...um...the um...what are they called, the 'Red Sox'?" We both had a good chuckle.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun March 31, 2013 1:02 am
by numbers
I think it's funny that people had a much higher opinion of last year's Red Sox team going into the season than they do this seasons'. Not that this years Red Sox team is that good, but last year's was one of the most poorly assembled teams you could put together.