Page 11 of 47

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:16 am
by BurtReynolds
Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:20 am
by B
BurtReynolds wrote:Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?
Why was there a Slimer? Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?

That's a silly reason to criticize the film.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:21 am
by BurtReynolds
B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?
Why was there a Slimer? Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?

That's a silly reason to criticize the film.
I'll criticize it however I goddamn please, thank you very much.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:24 am
by spike
so library basement scene, slimer, meeting with the mayor, and the stay puft marshmallow man. is this a scene for scene remake?

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:25 am
by Jorge
But there's a crowd-surfing scene, Spike.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:29 am
by spike
theplatypus wrote:But there's a crowd-surfing scene, Spike.
that's just a hipped up version of the hotel scene

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:30 am
by McParadigm
B wrote:Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?
If only the movie had explained that very thing.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:31 am
by spike
McParadigm wrote:
B wrote:Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?
If only the movie had explained that very thing.
because melissa mccarthy is fat like dan aykroyd

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:33 am
by BurtReynolds
Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man Woman. totally different thing.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:56 am
by @SkitchP
That's not Stay Puft.
Spoiler: show
Image


It's the ghost from the logo.. and his name is Rowan.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:57 am
by spike
wow, that's somehow even less inventive than rehashing stay puft.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:01 am
by @SkitchP
spike wrote:wow, that's somehow even less inventive than rehashing stay puft.

This looks so very bad.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:44 am
by epilogue
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:my god that does look stunningly awful
no, im just surprised i never thought of using leslie jones to carry the dothraki across the sea
:haha: :haha: :haha: :haha:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 3:29 am
by VinylGuy
Man, this is basically a remake. And it looks awful.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:11 pm
by epilogue
Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:17 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:
I will be doing the opposite of this

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:19 pm
by VinylGuy
Ill watch it, but just for the kicks of seeing the logo in a theatre again.

Actually, i went to see the original in a theatre a last year, it was amazing.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:19 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I'm gonna be honest.

I don't think I've ever seen the original Ghostbusters in its entirety.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:20 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:
I will be doing the opposite of this
Don't worry, pal. I'll see it twice so they don't know the difference.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:20 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm gonna be honest.

I don't think I've ever seen the original Ghostbusters in its entirety.
It's an outstanding film, Jordan. I'd highly recommend watching it.