Re: Now Playing
Posted: Tue June 16, 2015 4:01 am
I'll take your word for it.
Hadn't given Salival a listen through before. It was alright....Iholdthepain wrote:That must be some kind of psychedelic experience...
lol @ Maynard's Dick


I just don't understand how some albums can be called solo albums. I mean, this clearly isn't a solo album.Rangi Guy wrote:So it seems I like his solo stuff a lot more than anything he's done in a band
Yea I know. Still weird.zeb wrote:Pretty standard really.
Is it?Leatherhead wrote:Yea I know. Still weird.zeb wrote:Pretty standard really.
I guess I have a hard time believing all these people had 0 creative input, or that Jack White (or whoever the solo artist is) told all these different people exactly what to do. Also, doesn't the musicianship of the various musicians playing on the album have a large effect on how things sound? Didn't mean to make a big fuss, just a thing that bugs me about solo albums.Birds in Hell wrote:Is it?Leatherhead wrote:Yea I know. Still weird.zeb wrote:Pretty standard really.
I would've thought a 'solo album' is generally understood as being a shorthand way of differentiating a project where one person takes charge of the creative direction from a band-type situation in which a number of people have input.
I went to a Dan Deacon / Girl Talk show in the summer of, oh, 2007. I can only remember motion blurs, various sounds, trying to jump from the top of a speaker stack onto the stage (fell short the first time, succeeded the second!), doing a sloppy make-out session with someone on stage. It was basically the last hurrah of my youth; I started dating the woman who would become my wife like 3 weeks later.theplatypus wrote:Dan Deacon is awesome