Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Mon June 16, 2014 2:49 am
turned2black wrote:I hope the Heat can win their series. I'd love to see the Spurs crush them in The Finals.
turned2black wrote:I hope the Heat can win their series. I'd love to see the Spurs crush them in The Finals.
I really don't know where to put this championship. A large part of me wants to say this was their sweetest. Last year's Finals were brutal and to come back and just totally manhandle the Heat like this was obviously very satisfying. I think it also really validates Pop, because it shows how versatile he is as a coach. Their previous championships were all with super defensive teams and many people said he had to win "ugly", but instead, he adapted his own philosophy to better fit his players. Happy to see the Spurs organization get the kudos it deserves.turned2black wrote:I think the 2004-05 team is actually my favorite team. That 7-game Finals against Detroit is my favorite series. I love defense!Lament wrote:If they can finish this off, would this be the best Spurs title team? Their 62-20 regular season would be the best of their title teams, and I know I would consider this the roughest group of playoff opponents they've had.
Second would be the 2002–03 team. The Admiral gets his second championship and we get to tell Phil Jackson to shut the fuck up!
My second favorite series would be the Suns series in the 2006-07 playoffs when Big Shot Rob body-checked Nash. I live in Phoenix and fucking hate Suns fans.
This may be "the best" Spurs team ever, but I miss the mean and "nasty" Spurs teams of the past.
I think "shocking" is a bit strong.Lament wrote:Third most shocking outcome in an NBA Finals in my time as a fan.
Number one is obviously the Pistons dismantling the Lakers in 2004. No one outside of that locker room saw that coming. Number two would be the Bulls putting away Magic and the Lakers in five games in 1991. People forget that the Bulls weren't supposed to be able to hang with the Lakers, and after losing game one people wondered aloud if they'd get swept by L.A. I'd put this below that just because it wasn't hard to find people who thought the Spurs would win the series. You just couldn't find people who realistically thought they'd win in five games on the backs of three straight blow outs though.
What a phenomenal team. Well done. I see no reason why this team shouldn't be considered the favorite next year as well (assuming the big pieces all come back).
Five rings for Timmy and Pops. That's just insane.
I don't think so. There's no way on earth anyone could have convinced me going into this series that the Spurs would win in only five games, and that the the last three games would consist of them repeatedly taking Miami to the woodshed. They set the record for largest total margin of victory in an NBA Finals, right? I thought this would end up being one of the closest NBA Finals ever. For it to be one of the most one-sided ones ever blows my mind.Coach wrote:I think "shocking" is a bit strong.
During the 19-game win streak, you could see that their style would break teams mentally and I thought that would be their best hope in this series. I also worried about the effort the Spurs had put into this playoff run and really didn't want it to go 7.turned2black wrote:Their best hope is to win 1 and 2, steal game 3 or 4, then finish them in game 5.
Thanks, man. Maybe we'll see ya next year. Three years in a row would be incredible.4/5 wrote:Congrats t2b.
It can't be shocking when the Spurs were slight favorites in Vegas (4/5) prior to the Finals beginning.Lament wrote:I don't think so. There's no way on earth anyone could have convinced me going into this series that the Spurs would win in only five games, and that the the last three games would consist of them repeatedly taking Miami to the woodshed. They set the record for largest total margin of victory in an NBA Finals, right? I thought this would end up being one of the closest NBA Finals ever. For it to be one of the most one-sided ones ever blows my mind.Coach wrote:I think "shocking" is a bit strong.
That being said, I should have put it fourth. Dallas beating the Heat in 2011 should be third.
Kudos to 4/5 showing up today. Been in that position before. It sucks.turned2black wrote:Thanks, man. Maybe we'll see ya next year. Three years in a row would be incredible.4/5 wrote:Congrats t2b.
Besides the three I mentioned (Chicago in 91, Detroit in 04, and Dallas in 11), which outcomes in the past thirty seasons were more shocking than a slight favorite absolutely demolishing a team that had beaten them the year before and hadn't lost back to back playoff games in nearly three calendar years? By all means, show me ANYONE who realistically argued "Guys, the Spurs are probably gonna go into Miami and obliterate the Heat en route to wrapping up the series with three completely lopsided victories in a row. In fact, all of their wins will be by at least fifteen points."Coach wrote:It can't be shocking when the Spurs were slight favorites in Vegas (4/5) prior to the Finals beginning.
So you must be shocked that Miami hasn't won its seven titles yet?Lament wrote:Besides the three I mentioned (Chicago in 91, Detroit in 04, and Dallas in 11), which outcomes in the past thirty seasons were more shocking than a slight favorite absolutely demolishing a team that had beaten them the year before and hadn't lost back to back playoff games in nearly three calendar years? By all means, show me ANYONE who realistically argued "Guys, the Spurs are probably gonna go into Miami and obliterate the Heat en route to wrapping up the series with three completely lopsided victories in a row. In fact, all of their wins will be by at least fifteen points."Coach wrote:It can't be shocking when the Spurs were slight favorites in Vegas (4/5) prior to the Finals beginning.
Or terrifying lol.turned2black wrote:Thanks, man. Maybe we'll see ya next year. Three years in a row would be incredible.4/5 wrote:Congrats t2b.