Red Mosquito

run2death wrote:$8M or $9M a year isn't worth having to live in College Station.

Nope. He is coming from Tallahassee though.

Monkey_Driven wrote:

run2death wrote:$8M or $9M a year isn't worth having to live in College Station.

Nope. He is coming from Tallahassee though.

I enjoy Tallahassee. I'll take it over college station every day.

6 years 75 million??? is that the number for Jimbo? Holy Crap!

12.5 million a year to coach in College Station is a little better than 8 or 9.

Congratulations Coach. Good luck convincing the players they don't deserve any of that.

--

Scratch that, nevermind, I had it wrong. It's only 7.5 per. 10 year contract.

jwfocker wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

run2death wrote:$8M or $9M a year isn't worth having to live in College Station.

Nope. He is coming from Tallahassee though.

I enjoy Tallahassee. I'll take it over college station every day.

Fair. Both are not exactly vacation hot spots.

run2death wrote:$8M or $9M a year isn't worth having to live in College Station.

Plus getting your ass kicked by Nick Saban on a regular basis.

Monkey_Driven wrote:

jwfocker wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

run2death wrote:$8M or $9M a year isn't worth having to live in College Station.

Nope. He is coming from Tallahassee though.

I enjoy Tallahassee. I'll take it over college station every day.

Fair. Both are not exactly vacation hot spots.

Didn't say that and I wouldn't live in a vacation hot spot.

Can't say I've seen a field do that before.

Monkey_Driven wrote:Can't say I've seen a field do that before.

#metoo

whoever this color guy is, he's fucking annoying.

spike wrote:whoever this color guy is, he's fucking annoying.

Yup.

I would have gone for it instead of kicking the field goal. Make it a two score game or keep a field goal lead. You either go up by two possessions or force Wisconsin to score a TD to win.

Listening to Scott Van Pelt talk about this is..... horrible

Alabama deserves to be in this. Ohio State lost to freakin' Iowa.

Monkey_Driven wrote:Alabama deserves to be in this. Ohio State lost to freakin' Iowa.

go usc they are conference champs make them #4

Monkey_Driven wrote:Alabama deserves to be in this. Ohio State lost to freakin' Iowa.

What’s more important, good wins or bad losses. OSU has more of the former than Alabama does.

Joesanity wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:Alabama deserves to be in this. Ohio State lost to freakin' Iowa.

What’s more important, good wins or bad losses. OSU has more of the former than Alabama does.

I would say one loss is better than two. You can't lose to an unranked team by 30+ and play in the playoff. I just can't get past that.

If both teams had one loss Ohio State would totally deserve the spot.

Roll Tide

Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.

spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.

Apparently there was strife even after they decided on the final four, because they really wanted the possibility of a Clemson/Alabama championship, so some people wanted Clemson to be ranked #2 or Bama up to 3.

spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.

Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...

Monkey_Driven wrote:

spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.

Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...

Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.