Red Mosquito

dimejinky99 wrote: Has anyone watched the Madeline McCann doco on Netflix?

‘Cold, methodical and uncompromising, 'The Disappearance of Madeline McCann' puts the media, the investigation and the McCanns under the microscope.’

Halfway through it. Can’t believe some of the suspects they had. The most innocent people they could find.

Told you it doesn’t add up.
Now there’s proof it doesn’t add up.

https://www.anonews.co/leaving-neverlan ... y-exposed/

https://variety.com/2019/film/news/geof ... 203186608/

Geoffrey Rush Wins Defamation Case Over Sexual Misconduct Allegations

Winnie the Pooh
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/win ... 47601.html

I think it’s really fucking weird that she said this: “Winnie the Pooh lives with a whore, pays a whore to pretend to be his girlfriend”

Crazy part.
He voices hando onaka. A Star Wars character they’ve spent millions developing for the new Star Wars galaxys edge theme park. He’s voiced the whole thing for it.

This won’t matter to rabid Star Wars fans but it will soon enough to the general public

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think it’s really fucking weird that she said this: “Winnie the Pooh lives with a whore, pays a whore to pretend to be his girlfriend”

"She says after the kiss, Jim asked if she could “see him leaking, because that’s what I make him do when he touches me.”

Wtf is leaking?

verb_to_trust wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think it’s really fucking weird that she said this: “Winnie the Pooh lives with a whore, pays a whore to pretend to be his girlfriend”

"She says after the kiss, Jim asked if she could “see him leaking, because that’s what I make him do when he touches me.”

Wtf is leaking?

precum

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/us/r ... rvard.html

That's crazy dumb. The scummiest of the scum deserve defense.

Do such people deserve literally any legal support they can financially afford? Do we consider it offensive or inappropriate for a factor besides degree of wealth to determine access to legal defense in America? This isn’t a public defender we’re talking about.

Does Harvard have a right to protect its brand? Is its business model, which depends heavily on the prestige of that brand, subservient to Harvey Weinstein having lots of money?

Harvard should be nationalized but not until after I graduate.

McParadigm wrote:Do such people deserve literally any legal support they can financially afford?

I don’t know how to respond to this.

McParadigm wrote: Does Harvard have a right to protect its brand? Is its business model, which depends heavily on the prestige of that brand, subservient to Harvey Weinstein having lots of money?

He was not fired from the law school, only from his job as a house dean. Is that protecting the brand or living in fear of the students? And yes, Harvard is a private business and can do what it wants.

I guess they don't need that fat alumni money anymore if ivy league schools are gonna start distancing themselves from lawyers with bad people for clients.

Tony Robbins

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... lp-secrets

Ummm...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fbi- ... -058h7k9wd

That’s ok. He was doing the Lord’s work.

To assume the veracity of uncorroborated FBI reports about Martin Luther King Jr is not exactly intellectually responsible, which is not the same thing as saying that this didn't happen.

Bi_3 wrote:Ummm...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fbi- ... -058h7k9wd

Isn't it well known that he was having multiple affairs? Don't think it takes away at all from all the good he did. The man was human and had a weakness

Rangi Guy wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Ummm...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fbi- ... -058h7k9wd

Isn't it well known that he was having multiple affairs? Don't think it takes away at all from all the good he did. The man was human and had a weakness

Yes, but watching/laughing at a rape is different