Re: Integration Era Baseball Tournament: GARAINALS ARE CHAMP
Posted: Tue August 18, 2015 2:01 am
"Money like Madoff, Kill em like Adolf, Roy Halladay I’ll let a fuckin' K off."
Perfect.Lament wrote:The less teams, the better the chance your teams wins it all.cutuphalfdead wrote:We need you.
@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:We could just let everyone pick their own random subset of players. Skitch wants guys named dave. I'd take black people with less than 100 career homeruns.
we should come up with 10 bizarre criteria and then do a random draw to see who gets which one.
Guys whose name starts with D
Black Guys with less than 100 HR
Guys on 7 teams or more
Only Players accused of felonies
Players described only as gritty
Chicago Cubs players who won titles in other cities
Mustaches!
Worst All Stars
Players who did a lot of drugs (non-PED's)
Future ManagersRight now (and this is very loose), I'm thinking we do All-Time Franchise 2015 in October (once the 2015 stats are added to the site), then we'll do the Live Ball Era (probably in February). Then we'll have a mini-tournament with the four Era champions. Then we'll do an All-Time Tournament (probably in June) where everybody assembles a team consisting of players from any of their Era Tournament teams. That should bring us to All-Time Franchise 2016.cutuphalfdead wrote:Live ball and then all time.
Lament wrote:My team will be stacked.
I like that. Just not feeling it right now. Something in September could be alright.cutuphalfdead wrote:We take it easy until the fall.
The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I think I'd be more into making my own team based on my own subset. I wouldn't be as excited about someone else's random idea.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
The Argonaut wrote:I think I'd be more into making my own team based on my own subset. I wouldn't be as excited about someone else's random idea.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
Yes. This.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
Even Michael Jordan missed game winning shots. It's ok.@SkitchP wrote:*too (from the previous post, not the one just before this one)
Oh Chud. You be silly.cutuphalfdead wrote:My criteria will be all time WAR leaders.
I see what you're saying. But there are ideas that people are passionate about--like phil and the Canadians. or me and the powerless blacks...@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I think I'd be more into making my own team based on my own subset. I wouldn't be as excited about someone else's random idea.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
But then you're team could actually be good! (as chud has already tried to capitalize on)
The Argonaut wrote:I see what you're saying. But there are ideas that people are passionate about--like phil and the Canadians. or me and the powerless blacks...@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I think I'd be more into making my own team based on my own subset. I wouldn't be as excited about someone else's random idea.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
But then you're team could actually be good! (as chud has already tried to capitalize on)
maybe the other people in the tourney have to vote to OK that your team is sufficiently limiting to make it fair.
I doubt anyone would fight me hard on a Heartland team.The Argonaut wrote:I see what you're saying. But there are ideas that people are passionate about--like phil and the Canadians. or me and the powerless blacks...@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I think I'd be more into making my own team based on my own subset. I wouldn't be as excited about someone else's random idea.@SkitchP wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I'm actually getting excited about a "create-your-own-wacky-criteria" tournament.
I kinda am to. Although I like the notion of all the participants submitting one and then reassigning them. Maybe a short 20 game season or something?
But then you're team could actually be good! (as chud has already tried to capitalize on)
maybe the other people in the tourney have to vote to OK that your team is sufficiently limiting to make it fair.

College baseball rules!@SkitchP wrote:I am just going make a team of guys that #BRL saw in college.