Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply

Well

Great movie
8
20%
Good movie
16
40%
Just meh
10
25%
Marvel Universe wannabe
6
15%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by bada »

stip wrote:perhaps I should run really fast so I can go back in time and change that post?

I was talking about my penis.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Strat wrote:Do I need to see this?
no, go watch star wars again
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52024
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Do I need to see this to understand everything in the Suicide Squad movie? Were there any references to that?
no
I can't wait to see how Will Smith messes up Deadshot. I wish they would have kept Michael Rowe in the roll
bottom paged.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by Strat »

I bet I enjoy this more than i plan to
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by bune »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:It's very difficult to read what I've seen of white (maybe this is only his event film reviews) and not imagine that he is at least subconsciously motivated on part by a desire to repudiate whatever the popular opinion happens to be, so as to demonstrate his own superiority by standing apart from it.


That is not to say one can only like BVS for those reasons. Obviously that's nonsense. And clearly this guy is into snyders aesthetic, but that isn't what seems to be motivating his review.
White has been writing art/cultural criticism for decades. His ideology and what he values in art are distinct and coherent. Always have been. I don't think it's at all surprising that a gay black Christian conservative has a radically different viewpoint than other film critics, who tend to be white liberals. He is naturally positioned differently, not deliberately.
i swear to God I can't tell if you're serious or just taking the piss.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bune wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:It's very difficult to read what I've seen of white (maybe this is only his event film reviews) and not imagine that he is at least subconsciously motivated on part by a desire to repudiate whatever the popular opinion happens to be, so as to demonstrate his own superiority by standing apart from it.


That is not to say one can only like BVS for those reasons. Obviously that's nonsense. And clearly this guy is into snyders aesthetic, but that isn't what seems to be motivating his review.
White has been writing art/cultural criticism for decades. His ideology and what he values in art are distinct and coherent. Always have been. I don't think it's at all surprising that a gay black Christian conservative has a radically different viewpoint than other film critics, who tend to be white liberals. He is naturally positioned differently, not deliberately.
i swear to God I can't tell if you're serious or just taking the piss.
i don't know what you're confused about
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by tommymtcom »

Will Smith sucks ass
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by spike »

RM has been reduced to tournaments and posting about fantasy films. worst incarnation yet.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by bune »

durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
stip wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:In exchange for early access to a game we were working on, most print publications and European magazines agreed to give us a score of at least 85% (85% being a very important number as many contracts stipulate bonuses if their metacritic score is at least 85%). One day the boss blurted it out to me like it was no big deal but I was kinda shocked by it.

I doubt the newspaper critics are that dirty, but it wouldn't surprise me if the magazine and online sites are.
Early access to a game is pretty low key as far as bribes go. I'm not sure what a film co. would be able to offer to influence an aggregator site
Advertising spots would be a big one, but who knows. Rotten Tomatoes is probably more legit than Metacritic in any case.
Advertising spots, sure, and remember when .... I can't remember which studio... was flat out fabricating reviews for pull quotes. I'm sure that doesn't affect something like RT because those reviews were never actually written or published per se. But the fact that studios do that kind of shit at all shows how susceptible the industry is to fraud and fixed numbers.
That would be Sony.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bune wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:It's very difficult to read what I've seen of white (maybe this is only his event film reviews) and not imagine that he is at least subconsciously motivated on part by a desire to repudiate whatever the popular opinion happens to be, so as to demonstrate his own superiority by standing apart from it.


That is not to say one can only like BVS for those reasons. Obviously that's nonsense. And clearly this guy is into snyders aesthetic, but that isn't what seems to be motivating his review.
White has been writing art/cultural criticism for decades. His ideology and what he values in art are distinct and coherent. Always have been. I don't think it's at all surprising that a gay black Christian conservative has a radically different viewpoint than other film critics, who tend to be white liberals. He is naturally positioned differently, not deliberately.
i swear to God I can't tell if you're serious or just taking the piss.
i don't know what you're confused about
Mostly your posts can be read super sarcastic as well as super serious.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by spike »

this once great forum has been reduced to rubble. i blame LV and challenge him to the greatest gladiator match in the history of the world.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bune wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
stip wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:In exchange for early access to a game we were working on, most print publications and European magazines agreed to give us a score of at least 85% (85% being a very important number as many contracts stipulate bonuses if their metacritic score is at least 85%). One day the boss blurted it out to me like it was no big deal but I was kinda shocked by it.

I doubt the newspaper critics are that dirty, but it wouldn't surprise me if the magazine and online sites are.
Early access to a game is pretty low key as far as bribes go. I'm not sure what a film co. would be able to offer to influence an aggregator site
Advertising spots would be a big one, but who knows. Rotten Tomatoes is probably more legit than Metacritic in any case.
Advertising spots, sure, and remember when .... I can't remember which studio... was flat out fabricating reviews for pull quotes. I'm sure that doesn't affect something like RT because those reviews were never actually written or published per se. But the fact that studios do that kind of shit at all shows how susceptible the industry is to fraud and fixed numbers.
That would be Sony.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bune wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:It's very difficult to read what I've seen of white (maybe this is only his event film reviews) and not imagine that he is at least subconsciously motivated on part by a desire to repudiate whatever the popular opinion happens to be, so as to demonstrate his own superiority by standing apart from it.


That is not to say one can only like BVS for those reasons. Obviously that's nonsense. And clearly this guy is into snyders aesthetic, but that isn't what seems to be motivating his review.
White has been writing art/cultural criticism for decades. His ideology and what he values in art are distinct and coherent. Always have been. I don't think it's at all surprising that a gay black Christian conservative has a radically different viewpoint than other film critics, who tend to be white liberals. He is naturally positioned differently, not deliberately.
i swear to God I can't tell if you're serious or just taking the piss.
i don't know what you're confused about
Mostly your posts can be read super sarcastic as well as super serious.
i'm probably just kidding etc.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

spike wrote:this once great forum has been reduced to rubble. i blame LV and challenge him to the greatest gladiator match in the history of the world.
i hate r.e.m. and the force awakens though
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

actually i'm indifferent to r.e.m.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by spike »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
spike wrote:this once great forum has been reduced to rubble. i blame LV and challenge him to the greatest gladiator match in the history of the world.
i hate r.e.m. and the force awakens though
good point. do you think stip bleeds?
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

spike wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
spike wrote:this once great forum has been reduced to rubble. i blame LV and challenge him to the greatest gladiator match in the history of the world.
i hate r.e.m. and the force awakens though
good point. do you think stip bleeds?
i think stip is closer to lex luthor than superman
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by bune »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bune wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
stip wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:In exchange for early access to a game we were working on, most print publications and European magazines agreed to give us a score of at least 85% (85% being a very important number as many contracts stipulate bonuses if their metacritic score is at least 85%). One day the boss blurted it out to me like it was no big deal but I was kinda shocked by it.

I doubt the newspaper critics are that dirty, but it wouldn't surprise me if the magazine and online sites are.
Early access to a game is pretty low key as far as bribes go. I'm not sure what a film co. would be able to offer to influence an aggregator site
Advertising spots would be a big one, but who knows. Rotten Tomatoes is probably more legit than Metacritic in any case.
Advertising spots, sure, and remember when .... I can't remember which studio... was flat out fabricating reviews for pull quotes. I'm sure that doesn't affect something like RT because those reviews were never actually written or published per se. But the fact that studios do that kind of shit at all shows how susceptible the industry is to fraud and fixed numbers.
That would be Sony.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bune wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:It's very difficult to read what I've seen of white (maybe this is only his event film reviews) and not imagine that he is at least subconsciously motivated on part by a desire to repudiate whatever the popular opinion happens to be, so as to demonstrate his own superiority by standing apart from it.


That is not to say one can only like BVS for those reasons. Obviously that's nonsense. And clearly this guy is into snyders aesthetic, but that isn't what seems to be motivating his review.
White has been writing art/cultural criticism for decades. His ideology and what he values in art are distinct and coherent. Always have been. I don't think it's at all surprising that a gay black Christian conservative has a radically different viewpoint than other film critics, who tend to be white liberals. He is naturally positioned differently, not deliberately.
i swear to God I can't tell if you're serious or just taking the piss.
i don't know what you're confused about
Mostly your posts can be read super sarcastic as well as super serious.
i'm probably just kidding etc.
:thumbsup: gotcha fam.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36764
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Weird deleted scene, not sure what it's supposed to mean
Spoiler: show
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
HardTI
AnalLog
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri February 22, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by HardTI »

HardTI wrote:Can we talk about spoilers openly yet? Spoiler tag on this just in case not.
Spoiler: show
Is the vision batman sees while his device is decrypting forshadowing an Injustice storyline? Flash's part in there just points to that as much as the vision itself. Also, who else things Lois is likely pregnant?
Anyone?
You have to shave your nipples if you want to be with me.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36764
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Spoiler: show
It's either Injustice or the Flashpoint Paradox or some merging of the two stories.
Also, I didn't see anything to indicate that Lois is pregnant. What gave you that impression?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
HardTI
AnalLog
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri February 22, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: Movie: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Post by HardTI »

theplatypus wrote:
Spoiler: show
It's either Injustice or the Flashpoint Paradox or some merging of the two stories.
Also, I didn't see anything to indicate that Lois is pregnant. What gave you that impression?
Spoiler: show
purely speculative, but my wife mentioned it and that got me thinking. Her being pregnant was a major part of injustice. Also just this weekend a comic called super sons (son of batman and son of superman) was announced. I figure may the sex scene was in there for a reason.
You have to shave your nipples if you want to be with me.
Post Reply