Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Mon April 27, 2020 8:31 pm
Little Women (2019). Good film, but not sure if I like it more than the '94 version.
I was pretty underwhelmed by this one. Driver was good but the material really lagged in the second half and the kind of all glory to good oversight ending rang pretty fucking hollow.VinylGuy wrote:The Report.
Well, Adam Driver is always a force. The movie is alright, its a good political thriller but im kinda fed up with the whole ¨CIA- FBI saving the world¨ shit.
Its still a compelling movie.
I dont remember the 94 version. This one, i liked it a lot.darth_vedder wrote:Little Women (2019). Good film, but not sure if I like it more than the '94 version.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
you were great last night, btwtragabigzanda wrote:Just like grindrlennytheweedwhacker wrote:midnight special...the journey was better than the destination
I liked it but it also clearly did not deserve best picture/best director. Also the Odenkirk casting/costuming was awful.VinylGuy wrote:I dont remember the 94 version. This one, i liked it a lot.darth_vedder wrote:Little Women (2019). Good film, but not sure if I like it more than the '94 version.
you were in the wrong headspace last nightswan wrote:We’ve been doing a rewatch of the Coen Bros filmography. I was pretty surprised the other night to feel that Miller’s Crossing wasn’t the gripping masterpiece I remembered. Maybe I was in the wrong headspace that night, but meh.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
that one definitely took another viewing and some online articlesFarmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)
Or is it about the cost of creativitytragabigzanda wrote:Oh man. There are lots of deep dive musings on it out there, and I believe some posit that Goodman was the devil. At its heart, it’s about the nature of high art vs art-for-commerce.Farmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)
There are few movies that I've craved outside thoughts/opinions about less than Barton Fink. It is perfect. And other people's interpretations could only lessen what I got from it. I don't even want to hear the Coens talk about it.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:that one definitely took another viewing and some online articlesFarmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)
And about how his ego ruins what he wants to achieve.durdencommatyler wrote:Or is it about the cost of creativitytragabigzanda wrote:Oh man. There are lots of deep dive musings on it out there, and I believe some posit that Goodman was the devil. At its heart, it’s about the nature of high art vs art-for-commerce.Farmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)
Or maybe a retelling of a classic biblical parableAnders wrote:And about how his ego ruins what he wants to achieve.durdencommatyler wrote:Or is it about the cost of creativitytragabigzanda wrote:Oh man. There are lots of deep dive musings on it out there, and I believe some posit that Goodman was the devil. At its heart, it’s about the nature of high art vs art-for-commerce.Farmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)
So much to process. It’s a great movie. One of my rare 10/10 movies.durdencommatyler wrote:Or maybe a retelling of a classic biblical parableAnders wrote:And about how his ego ruins what he wants to achieve.durdencommatyler wrote:Or is it about the cost of creativitytragabigzanda wrote:Oh man. There are lots of deep dive musings on it out there, and I believe some posit that Goodman was the devil. At its heart, it’s about the nature of high art vs art-for-commerce.Farmer John wrote:I watched Barton Fink for the first time the other day. I liked it (I think). Someone smarter than me would need to explain what it all means. John Goodman was great. (was he the devil?)