Red Mosquito

verb_to_trust wrote:What exactly do you expect businesses to spend the money on that would help B? Virus is gonna virus.

What did you expect our cooks to do, wash their hands after wiping their ass? Virus gonna virus.

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:That list can mostly be done without a big daddy government check. A door man? Fucking why?

To enforce masks at a minimum.

verb_to_trust wrote:So some poor teenager can get breathed on by every single person that comes in?

If you want money, put an adult with a minimum of training up there, and pay them a premium for the risk.

verb_to_trust wrote:Build a new enclosed restaurant that is "outside"?

You're not so stupid as to think that's what I'm suggesting.

You're probably suggesting those bougie personal igloo type things with their own personal space heater. If you think the government should pay for those so some absolute horror of a couple can dine out I would tend to disagree.

Here's an idea. If you are at risk, don't go out to eat. If you feel like you can assume the risk and patronize a business, go for it.

McParadigm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:What exactly do you expect businesses to spend the money on that would help B? Virus is gonna virus.

What did you expect our cooks to do, wash their hands after wiping their ass? Virus gonna virus.

Is soap some new revolutionary thing that restaurants only had to be mindful of post covid clown world?

Maybe Reid should weigh in on the effectiveness of having mask gestapo posted up at the door? Doesn't seem like the kind of vibe you want to present your customers with as a first impression. Can't we assume that most people would be able to read a sign at the door saying "please wear a mask to enter"?

verb_to_trust wrote:some new revolutionary thing that restaurants only had to be mindful of post covid clown world?

I deeply sympathize with your living in a changing world

McParadigm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:some new revolutionary thing that restaurants only had to be mindful of post covid clown world?

I deeply sympathize with your living in a changing world

What's different about it in this context? The same thing your cook did pre covid (wash hands) is the same thing he should be doing post covid (with cotton face diaper).

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:That list can mostly be done without a big daddy government check. A door man? Fucking why?

To enforce masks at a minimum.

verb_to_trust wrote:So some poor teenager can get breathed on by every single person that comes in?

If you want money, put an adult with a minimum of training up there, and pay them a premium for the risk.

verb_to_trust wrote:Build a new enclosed restaurant that is "outside"?

You're not so stupid as to think that's what I'm suggesting.

You're probably suggesting those bougie personal igloo type things with their own personal space heater. If you think the government should pay for those so some absolute horror of a couple can dine out I would tend to disagree.

Here's an idea. If you are at risk, don't go out to eat. If you feel like you can assume the risk and patronize a business, go for it.

because going out to eat means being maskless indoors with other people maskless indoors, and that's how this spreads. nine months in and you're still trying negotiate with a virus.

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:That list can mostly be done without a big daddy government check. A door man? Fucking why?

To enforce masks at a minimum.

verb_to_trust wrote:So some poor teenager can get breathed on by every single person that comes in?

If you want money, put an adult with a minimum of training up there, and pay them a premium for the risk.

verb_to_trust wrote:Build a new enclosed restaurant that is "outside"?

You're not so stupid as to think that's what I'm suggesting.

You're probably suggesting those bougie personal igloo type things with their own personal space heater. If you think the government should pay for those so some absolute horror of a couple can dine out I would tend to disagree.

Here's an idea. If you are at risk, don't go out to eat. If you feel like you can assume the risk and patronize a business, go for it.

because going out to eat means being maskless indoors with other people maskless indoors, and that's how this spreads. nine months in and dullards like you are still trying negotiate with a virus.

It's spreading no matter what. If some 25 year old wants to go eat a burger I could honestly care less.

If the government or public health weirdos want to do something to help they should roll out the vaccine as fast as humanly possible.

Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:That list can mostly be done without a big daddy government check. A door man? Fucking why?

To enforce masks at a minimum.

verb_to_trust wrote:So some poor teenager can get breathed on by every single person that comes in?

If you want money, put an adult with a minimum of training up there, and pay them a premium for the risk.

verb_to_trust wrote:Build a new enclosed restaurant that is "outside"?

You're not so stupid as to think that's what I'm suggesting.

You're probably suggesting those bougie personal igloo type things with their own personal space heater. If you think the government should pay for those so some absolute horror of a couple can dine out I would tend to disagree.

Here's an idea. If you are at risk, don't go out to eat. If you feel like you can assume the risk and patronize a business, go for it.

because going out to eat means being maskless indoors with other people maskless indoors, and that's how this spreads. nine months in and dullards like you are still trying negotiate with a virus.

It's spreading no matter what. If some 25 year old wants to go eat a burger I could honestly care less.

If the government or public health weirdos want to do something to help they should roll out the vaccine as fast as humanly possible.

nine months in and you think the government wants to help.

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

"Buy soap"

"Send people home if sick"

"Wear mask"

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:That list can mostly be done without a big daddy government check. A door man? Fucking why?

To enforce masks at a minimum.

verb_to_trust wrote:So some poor teenager can get breathed on by every single person that comes in?

If you want money, put an adult with a minimum of training up there, and pay them a premium for the risk.

verb_to_trust wrote:Build a new enclosed restaurant that is "outside"?

You're not so stupid as to think that's what I'm suggesting.

You're probably suggesting those bougie personal igloo type things with their own personal space heater. If you think the government should pay for those so some absolute horror of a couple can dine out I would tend to disagree.

Here's an idea. If you are at risk, don't go out to eat. If you feel like you can assume the risk and patronize a business, go for it.

because going out to eat means being maskless indoors with other people maskless indoors, and that's how this spreads. nine months in and dullards like you are still trying negotiate with a virus.

It's spreading no matter what. If some 25 year old wants to go eat a burger I could honestly care less.

If the government or public health weirdos want to do something to help they should roll out the vaccine as fast as humanly possible.

nine months in and you think the government wants to help.

The government did dump a bunch of money into vaccine development, which is the only thing that will release us from purgatory, although a lot of the NEW STRAIN and SOCIAL DISTANCE AFTER VACCINATION talk has me a little skeptical anything will be good enough.

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

So what do you want to do? Build a time machine? Will our pooled $600 checks cover that project?

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

So what do you want to do? Build a time machine? Will our pooled $600 checks cover that project?

it's still spreading; people are still getting infected. i'm not sure you understand what contact tracing is.

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

So what do you want to do? Build a time machine? Will our pooled $600 checks cover that project?

it's still spreading; people are still getting infected. i'm not sure you understand what contact tracing is.

Maybe you could do it Spike? You have a phone I presume and probably never leave your house.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

So what do you want to do? Build a time machine? Will our pooled $600 checks cover that project?

it's still spreading; people are still getting infected. i'm not sure you understand what contact tracing is.

Maybe you could do it Spike? You have a phone I presume and probably never leave your house.

i sent in an application about a month ago to see what may be available, actually.

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Here in MT, a better use of funding would be more employees at the county health departments to monitor/instruct businesses on compliance.

*conduct more robust contact tracing

You're out of touch with reality if you think test and trace is the answer. It's been a fucking year of this shit spreading.

... in part because effective contact tracing has been mostly absent...

So what do you want to do? Build a time machine? Will our pooled $600 checks cover that project?

it's still spreading; people are still getting infected. i'm not sure you understand what contact tracing is.

Maybe you could do it Spike? You have a phone I presume and probably never leave your house.

i sent in an application about a month ago to see what may be available, actually.

If you call me I'm not answering