Page 12 of 13
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 12:48 am
by Norah
Birds in Hell wrote:
Jesus, what a moron.
Seriously, completely misses the point.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 12:49 am
by Norah
Hey, remember when he called me out and said that if I had better quality recording I should send them his way and then offered a HD/P so he could have the entire audio archive/sv series/pre-2k soundboard remasters/etc/etc/etc? Well he never once replied to that offer.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 12:59 am
by evenslow
This guy did the impossible: he made me sympathize with chud
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:07 am
by Norah
I can't believe he bitched out the tapers. I mean, where else would he get his content?
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:08 am
by stip
there were seven things on his list of 5.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:08 am
by stip
oh nevermind. that's the name of the column.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:08 am
by stip
cutuphalfdead wrote:I can't believe he bitched out the tapers. I mean, where else would he get his content?
from the internet, of course!
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:10 am
by Lament
Wow. Fuck that guy.
Where do "Dudes Who Rank The Different Types Of Bad Pearl Jam Fans" rank on his list?
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:10 am
by stip
Don’t fret gremmies, we’re not always cynical. The next High 5 we write will be about the Best Pearl Jam fans.
next column, I'd presume
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:17 am
by Lament
Think about it: if Pearl Jam fans strictly abided by the Tapers’ rules not covert to mp3, there would literally be no accessible, live Pearl Jam available prior to 2000. Would you rather that Mr. Taper? Now no one can listen to early Pearl Jam. Are you really that selfish? Was it worth blowing the sound guy so you and your 4 friends could listen to the soundboard for MSG II 1998? It was? Fine, but you got something on your lip.
It's almost amazing how many things are wrong with the logic used in this paragraph.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:20 am
by evenslow
Lament wrote:Think about it: if Pearl Jam fans strictly abided by the Tapers’ rules not covert to mp3, there would literally be no accessible, live Pearl Jam available prior to 2000. Would you rather that Mr. Taper? Now no one can listen to early Pearl Jam. Are you really that selfish? Was it worth blowing the sound guy so you and your 4 friends could listen to the soundboard for MSG II 1998? It was? Fine, but you got something on your lip.
It's almost amazing how many things are wrong with the logic used in this paragraph.
I know. The sound guy never accepts BJ's.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:21 am
by EJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:
Jesus, what a moron.
Seriously, completely misses the point.
Yup. I'm now on team Chud with this issue. He really comes across as a jackass.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:21 am
by Norah
He's so stupid. There isn't even a soundboard recording of MSG2 in circulation!
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:23 am
by Jorge
But Gremmies all over the world love the dot net!
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:24 am
by Strat
Wow.
Team chud now for sure.
What a first class delta bravo
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:25 am
by EJ
theplatypus wrote:But Gremmies all over the world love the dot net!
That might be a more cringeworthy fan classification than Jamily.
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:25 am
by evenslow
#8 must have been PJ fans that call their PJ site 'the dot net.'
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:27 am
by ---
what i wouldn't give to cast a rainbow all over this thread's comely jowls
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 1:27 am
by LikeLukin
cutuphalfdead wrote:He's so stupid. There isn't even a soundboard recording of MSG2 in circulation!
Re: Demos
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 3:25 am
by Kevin Davis
I feel ashamed that a thread I created brought this nincompoop to our forum. What an embarrassing piece of writing to have to claim as one's own.