Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Posted: Sun December 10, 2023 3:54 am
Bring back Dave A
96583UP wrote:Bring back Dave A

you mean when he was a part of the biggest band in the world making a crap ton of money? yeah, super strange to be obsessed about that.VinylGuy wrote:it still seems so weird Dave is obsessed with that moment of his life
Which would produce more revenue over the long haul?tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
according to him, he has got nothing. He signed it all away when he was fired.tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
Prob not the best decision…tragabigzanda wrote:Well that explains thingsStrat wrote:according to him, he has got nothing. He signed it all away when he was fired.tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
At the cost of his own enjoyment and sense of personal safety? Nah. Even that Instagram post above makes the guy look like a jackass.Strat wrote:to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
It rarely happens, believe me. If anything, you find them to be worse, especially in the Trumpy climate we're living in now.tragabigzanda wrote: Agreed. There are people from my 20s who were really toxic personalities at the time. I'd like to think they've grown and evolved since then, but why would I ever go out of my way to find out?
for someone whose m.o. is all about love and putting fixin on it maybe it would evidence emotional maturity to seek to make amendsguitar_davey wrote:At the cost of his own enjoyment and sense of personal safety? Nah. Even that Instagram post above makes the guy look like a jackass.Strat wrote:to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over