Re: Unpopular Movie Opinions
Posted: Wed November 12, 2014 5:34 pm
I wish Dev would weigh in on this debate.
i beg to differLoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, the intent of the artist does not dictate the quality of the art.
You'd be wrong.malice wrote:i beg to differLoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, the intent of the artist does not dictate the quality of the art.
of course!LoathedVermin72 wrote:You'd be wrong.malice wrote:i beg to differLoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, the intent of the artist does not dictate the quality of the art.
Confidence and humility are not mutually exclusiveAlex wrote:LV, i hereby issue a word of caution: opinionated, overconfident RMers have not fared well on RM (thodoks, harmless, broken iris, harry lime). tread lightly, or some ignoble fate might also befall your account.
I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
neither do i, yet you have no problem telling me i'd be wrong to disagree with you...LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
shades of harry limeLoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
Sorry, I came on a bit strong. The "You'd be wrong." was meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek. My apologies, sincerely.malice wrote:neither do i, yet you have no problem telling me i'd be wrong to disagree with you...LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
Take it to the metal thread.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Sorry, I came on a bit strong. The "You'd be wrong." was meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek. My apologies, sincerely.malice wrote:neither do i, yet you have no problem telling me i'd be wrong to disagree with you...LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
But let me ask you this: If you take in a work of art you think is great, but then find out after the fact that the artist is a Neo-Nazi who made the work with racist intent even though that doesn’t come across to you at all in the work, is the greatness of the work now invalidated?
I've read some of that dude's posts. We definitely would not have seen eye to eye on many things. But I bet the debates would have been fun.Alex wrote:shades of harry limeLoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
i've had this argument already with kevin davis in the N&D forum.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Sorry, I came on a bit strong. The "You'd be wrong." was meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek. My apologies, sincerely.malice wrote:neither do i, yet you have no problem telling me i'd be wrong to disagree with you...LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
But let me ask you this: If you take in a work of art you think is great, but then find out after the fact that the artist is a Neo-Nazi who made the work with racist intent even though that doesn’t come across to you at all in the work, is the greatness of the work now invalidated?
What are your feelings on Hitler's dog art?malice wrote:i've had this argument already with kevin davis in the N&D forum.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Sorry, I came on a bit strong. The "You'd be wrong." was meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek. My apologies, sincerely.malice wrote:neither do i, yet you have no problem telling me i'd be wrong to disagree with you...LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't believe in defining my opinions against what others think.Alex wrote:i've realized that the thing that irks me about LV is that there is nary a "call me crazy, but...," "i know i'm outnumbered here," or a "this might rub you the wrong way" contained within his brazen declarations. there are times we must qualify our statements, so as not to let the confidence of our comments attract ire. when words are uttered as if in a void, there is a presumption of objectivity to them.
But let me ask you this: If you take in a work of art you think is great, but then find out after the fact that the artist is a Neo-Nazi who made the work with racist intent even though that doesn’t come across to you at all in the work, is the greatness of the work now invalidated?
he's never spoken to me since.